I want it now! - 5090ti 30GB.

[Major Kudos™]

You must be kidding me?
They sold ALL the best chips to big tech for AI data centers!

[Izzy]

I really don't want to have to update my PC yet. I'm going to wait and see how my 3070ti works. I fear my CPU will be a problem though as I have a i5-9600k.

[MrCrowBard]

We've moved forward a console generation and the amount of unified RAM available to devs has doubled and gotten faster (8GB DDR5 vs 16GB DDR6 from PS4 to PS5). That has a direct impact on the amount of VRAM needed for your GPU which is why you're now seeing much more 30xx and 40xx in recommended lists. Add to that the big push for better lighting in game via RTX etc which adds a lot to VRAM usage.

Sure PCs have dedicated RAM but as more and more VRAM requirements are needed and the access speed consoles have with unified RAM it's ultimately means we're going to need more and more VRAM to remain on par with consoles.

[Creamy P1e Skwert]

RTX 3080 Doesn't mean it's 100% Ultra end HIGHEST GRAPHICS ever.

Bro, RTX 3060 Ti is only 19-28% weaker than RTX 3080. That's what the sources are telling me, look, even if it's 45% weaker, great, not that big of a difference.

My RTX 3060 Ti is 114% better than my old GTX 1060 and I almost see the same gaming experience, I mean not really. But it's getting close.

[molly_zero]

All I've got is a GeForce RTX 2060 so I guess it's no use me buying this game at all?

[evanloohaklm]

Originally posted by molly_zero:

All I've got is a GeForce RTX 2060 so I guess it's no use me buying this game at all?

Well, you'll have to see how well the game performs on your hardware and make a choice then.

[evanloohaklm]

Originally posted by Supersquid:

I could afford that and I'm only 23.

Mmhm, yeah sure you are buddy.

[evanloohaklm]

Originally posted by Supersquid:

Originally posted by evanloohaklm:

Mmhm, yeah sure you are buddy.

It was a typo. I meant 13.
But not for long! I'll be 14 soon!

interesting

[evanloohaklm]

Originally posted by Supersquid:

Originally posted by evanloohaklm:

interesting

How's that interesting?

ok

[tschaedL]

Minimum is " Nvidia® GeForce™ GTX 970 (4 GB) | AMD equivalent"

if you want more you need more. You understand.

[SolidSnake]

Originally posted by Major Kudos:

You must be kidding me? 3080 recomended for Cities 2........What the ....!

In the case of unoptimized game code, there is no guarantee that the game will use the available power of the hypothetical 5090. This is the problem.
I never thought a game like this would have performance issues, I played a lot of Transport Fever 2 on a G712LU-EV001 laptop with a 1660Ti at 80+ fps after they moved to Vulcan.

[Mixer]

It does seem wierd to have a minimum of a 970 and a recommend of a 3080, like those cards are on a whole different level performance wise.

[Apples]

Graphics not good enough, they look worse than CS1!

Specs too high! I don't want to upgrade!

Unity is bad! we must boycott Cities Skylines and all other Unity based games, to help fight for the devs!

DLC's are wonderful we need more and more

Why no Multiplayer!?! i can't play without it!

[evanloohaklm]

Originally posted by Apples:

Graphics not good enough, they look worse than CS1!

Specs too high! I don't want to upgrade!

Unity is bad! we must boycott Cities Skylines and all other Unity based games, to help fight for the devs!

DLC's are wonderful we need more and more

Why no Multiplayer!?! i can't play without it!

1. That's subjective.
2. Well, then don't play the game if you don't want to.
3. Wouldn't that just hurt the developers? Plus I think Unity reverted some changes or something like that.
4. I guess that is indeed true.
5. You don't need multiplayer, how would that even work?

[Supersquid]

Originally posted by evanloohaklm:

Originally posted by Apples:

Graphics not good enough, they look worse than CS1!

Specs too high! I don't want to upgrade!

Unity is bad! we must boycott Cities Skylines and all other Unity based games, to help fight for the devs!

DLC's are wonderful we need more and more

Why no Multiplayer!?! i can't play without it!

1. That's subjective.
2. Well, then don't play the game if you don't want to.
3. Wouldn't that just hurt the developers? Plus I think Unity reverted some changes or something like that.
4. I guess that is indeed true.
5. You don't need multiplayer, how would that even work?

I'm pretty sure that post was a joke. 🤦

[evanloohaklm]

Originally posted by Supersquid:

Originally posted by evanloohaklm:

1. That's subjective.
2. Well, then don't play the game if you don't want to.
3. Wouldn't that just hurt the developers? Plus I think Unity reverted some changes or something like that.
4. I guess that is indeed true.
5. You don't need multiplayer, how would that even work?

I'm pretty sure that post was a joke. 🤦

It's better to be safe than sorry, or something like that.