安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
one of the best 10 pounds 8 ever spent
Personally I played Planetary Annhinlation, I have it, I was even an early backer. I found it boring as hell to play when it came out, regardless of the patches. As for Titans, many early backers feel that was a kick in the teeth, it should have been a free addon/patch, as it is, PA still feels like an unfinished game and not worth the money paid,
I have no desire to go back and play it, where as I have spent countless houses on sup com, sup com fa (I had it on disk before the steam version so the hours are wrong)
I am not quite sure why, on paper it should be great, but it just does not work for me. I would actually rank it as one of the most boring stratergy games. The potential was huge and they just did not deliver, at least for me and many others (hence the countless threads on the pa forums).
Lately I am playing the Star Trek Armarda III mod for Sins of a solar Empire, that is a fan made mod, free and it feels so much more polished and finished than PA and makes me want to go back and play it more each time.
Because Planetary Annihilation needs like 12-16 GB RAM to really get the most out of it, and I have 6. Also, just not a fan of the gameplay. I have PA, and Titans doesn't add enough to make me want to throw extra money at the devs.
Planetary Annihilation was a nice experiment, and an interesting idea (though not without flaws, horrid optimization, and not enough automation), but adding a few super units and calling it a brand new game doesn't make it worth the price, to me.
Meanwhile, Forged Alliance and Supreme Commander 2 have solid gameplay that, despite their age, still holds up. Especially when you add mods to the mix.
It juts feels like a carbon copy of SC with tacked on gimmicks, and the performance is ridiculous.
Just because a game is "dead" doesn't mean it's not good. Just because there's a newer *-like doesn't mean we have to abandon the things we love to play.
Newer isn't always better. In fact, it rarely is.
2) you are huge fanboy and PA:T is your religion, you trying to convert us
it add tons of units (very different units), fun, new AI etc...
total mayhem (available, new units for all factions, experimentals units for each tier, new defense systems, experimental defence for all tier, etc...)
battle sector: earth (in dev, 2 new faction, infantry units, no perfect aiming (guns aren't 100% accurate anymore) and more to come)
brewlan (available, add mines, special engineers, new experimentals, walls for all tier, etc...)
and more
http://www.moddb.com/games/supreme-commander/mods
what feels interresting in supcom is that it feels like a big chess war game as planetary annihilation feels like a space ant war game (now with TITAN :D)
there is way more depth in supcom than in pa:t . tho pa:t seems more appealing, more friendly than supcom.
Last days for what players say FAForever there was always + 1k players online ....to a 2007 game thats just daam awsome.