Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Also, since recorded proof shows that the table is not valid, it makes for even more questions on how exactly you "sort of" datamined it. I can create an Excel sheet anytime I want, without even seeing the game.
On top, all of this only makes sense if we have the receiving side data, being armour protection. How can you actually measure bullit damage if you don't know what stopped the bullit? And whether the hitbox is divided into the actual parts (e.g. buttocks protection only protects against bullits from behind at a certain specified angle), whether the armour parts add up, whether any RNG is involved, the fact of being prone vs crouching, vs moving/running/jumping, same on both shooting and receiving side, etc.etc. There are so many parameters that I wonder how you could know any damage value, unless you hack the game (or are the developer himself who leaks this out, in which case it is even more strange that armour class is not leaked out for whatever reason).
Now, if we would say that the table is the actual programming and a kind way of devs of giving us a break, it would also mean that programmed weapon mechanics are bugged/flawed, as they diverge from said table. Everyone decide for themselves which is worse: a table that lies (about hidden RNG most likely) or bugged weapon mechanics.
And Peter this table consists of values that are mined straight from the program. I don't believe that you had to headshot 3 times on an unarmored person to kill, unless your connection to the game was poor.
Your recorded proof (especially since you did not provide it here) doesn't disprove anything and certainly does not put into question where we got this data from. I have yet to see rng in the weapon mechanics yet (especially for damage) and I have also compared the findings of this table to the game itself and find them consistent with each other.
https://youtu.be/tCDGtwa7U0w
Your proof is a table that anyone could put together. And anyone could repeat themselves that it is "mined straight from the program". And still not provide any insight into HOW you mined the program, as if its source code is out there for grabs.
Also, you are not responding to any of my raised points. You are basically repeating that you are right and I'm wrong, without discussing the raised points. That's a losing hand in your poker game.
I know the person who datamined these so I'm pretty sure I can trust him and I am 100% positive that these are authentic.
But just for you I will do some testing and post the results here.
This wannabee white-coat approach does not say anything to me and I'm sure to none of the other readers, except for the TV shoppers who believe in the 50 dollar comb that gives you a Jesus hairstyle and total dominion. I may well have a 10-strong team of coders and programmers in the next room. If I want to. Oh and I trust them, so I'm right and you're wrong. Quality discussion.
The stats were pulled from the wiki page which seems a little out of date so take the numbers with a pinch of salt. If someone can find an updated set of data I'd be grateful.