Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Surprisingly, Rainer.
I am a bit afraid of replaying this game, though, as I tried to play Evelyn as close as I am myself in real life, obliging yet reserved and ambivalent. I also wonder if I would feel comfortable siding with a pitiful creeper like Soren or a smug pompous narcissist like Rainer.
As an aside, I loved the yawning gulf between Rainer's image of Eliza as the seed of an AI revolution, and the reality of it as a mediocre chat bot run by an inexperienced kid who's never bothered to actually use it. This absolutely matches my experience of the tech industry.
I do wish we could see the stats on people's choices though - other Zachtronics games as well as other narrative-choice games typically have that. I think the game leans very heavily in one direction but I'm not sure.
Tell me more...
Artificial intelligence is more a brand than it is an actual tool used in technology. Many of the major software companies try to make their machine learning-based services seem almost human, with names like Alexa and Watson. They want you to believe there is this unified, near general intelligence behind the speaker, when it's really just a set of specialized programs all working in concert.
You can look at a tweet from Elon Musk to get a sense of where the 'AI' brand claims to be at (on the cusp of general intelligence, soon to vastly exceed humanity), but the reality is that machine learning tools are nowhere close to that, both in terms of the hardware that would be necessary to create such an intelligence and the software that could actually behave like a human given the hardware. It will be many decades, minimum, before we see anything resembling general intelligence, and it's just as likely that we won't see it anywhere near our lifetimes.
And the idea that the moment AI's reach human intelligence they will suddenly enhance themselves in a convergence-like event is dubious. The improvements in hardware that have enabled modern machine learning can only come from labor and resources that do not exponentially grow. My biggest doubt about AI's future is that computer hardware isn't improving at the rate it used to. We may not ever get the hardware for a general intelligence, and I'm suspicious of the idea that some AI-god will be able to magically reinstate Moore's Law.
Never take any talk of AI in our culture at face-value. It's part of a techno-utopian narrative whose primary purpose is to paper over all the deeper structural problems in our country by claiming that technology will either fix all our societal ills or completely eclipse them. You can see a bit of that in Soren's story. Machine learning technology is truly amazing, and will enable all kinds of interesting and exciting discoveries in the future, but it will not be the world-shaking existential threat in the way that someone like Rainer or Elon Musk would have you believe.
Eliza takes it to the level of satire, but that just helps drive the point home.
Might as well have been ripped from the headlines:
Rainer: We take data privacy VERY seriously!
Also Rainer: Here's access to Soren's data.
Rainer's company: We gave your data to a third party and it got stolen. Sorry!
I thought Soren's tech could be a good aid to people in extremes of emotion but was a straight up dystopia if everyone was using it all the time, as in his ending. Negative emotions help us avoid certain actions that harm others and ourselves - in the hands of someone responsible it's amazing technology but Soren is anything but responsible.
- I (Evelyn) am not a rebell like Nora, nor am I an artist or rockstar. That life is great for her, but won't work for me.
- Rae... is so convinced of Eliza, so that she even takes a critical aricle personal. I'm not sure what an ongoing career as a proxy could have given me, considering the doubts I already had with all of this.
- I sympathized with Soren, though he is kind of a creep. ;) But I wondered if dreaming the reality away can really be the solution. It might be similar to what Maja thought of that meadow-lands-game: afterwards (/when you wake up) your life is still as ♥♥♥♥♥♥ as it was before. So I didn't really believe in that.
- I was a little curious where Rainer would take this whole thing with Eliza and the AI. Would have been interesting ho it all turned out. But in the end he is not a good guy, his aim is not to help people, but to gain power - and that wasn't of any importance to me. Also, the way he handled Soren's personal data showed how little morals ment to him.
So, loneliness it was agian... But I loved the positivity of Evelyn in the end.
Same with me! I chose Rainer because I wanted to turn Eliza into something that wasn't a chatbot that could actually help people like you do when you go off book in that one chapter. It doesn't really seem to necessarily end that way though. . .
My least favourite ending was the one with Rainer. It felt cold, corporate, and all the focus was on advancing the technology. It seemed to me that Evelyn's character had the most drastic change in that ending, and it was questionable who was really benefiting from the technology ultimately.