安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
On the controls side, I'm used to the gamecube ones from physical machine & Dolphin, but I'm glad the Switch port ones are mostly easy to adapt to. I've yet to play Galaxy on Switch at time of writing.
It also means there's no reason to get any of the secret shines or collect the blue coins unless you really want to go for 100% completion, which I personally don't mind since I have so much fun doing so, and I'd happily take that over both Galaxy games, where Galaxy 1 made you replay the whole game as Luigi and Galaxy 2 made you collect those green stars, something you should've been able to just collect through the main game.
Comparatively Mario 64 sucks. Comparatively. Both Sunshine and Galaxy are better despite Mario 64 being alright. Sunshine has better graphics, better controls, voice acting which is a massive plus regardless of quality, fun secret levels and a better camera.
I can list the problems Sunshine has on one hand: namely:
A few shines are bad and/or tedious making them not worth it such as the Yoshi one in Delfino Plaza, the blue coin hunting and a few of the more hidden ones like spraying golden birds with water.
There's not enough slides in the game compared to Mario 64 or Mario Galaxy 2
It takes place in a holiday resort and yet there's no waterpark world, the closest it gets being Ricco Harbour & Pinna Park.
Also Sunshine is about an island, not some random holiday resort...
No, the camera is not bad and the secret levels are mostly fun except the chuckster one near the end. I bet you didn't even play Sunshine and are only saying that to be contrary.
Voice acting is better than mute characters because mute characters are boring. The only reason games used to have no voice acting is because they couldn't fit it in the game since computers couldn't handle more than one to two bytes at a time back then. Now they can have voices and they are better for it. Mute characters just look like arseholes who climb on people's furniture, steal the cutlery and stare at people when they tell them to stop. It's even worse if they have a name or existing reputation with other characters because they must have spoken at some point to introduce themselves.
Even bad or cringey voice acting is better than none at all because at least it's something. I will grit my teeth and bear bad voice acting if it means I can have more relateable characters than creepy mutes.
Not to mention the other kind of voiceless character where they speak gibberish with subtitles is the worst because it's cheating. It makes said characters come across as half-awake drunks.
Despite Mario Sunshine being better than Mario 64, A Hat in TIme is a way better 3D Mario game than any of them, thanks in part to full voice acting and it's not afraid to get dark like Mario Galaxy's end of game apocalypse e.g. the Subcon Forest zone, the Empress and pretty much every faction in the game when you read between the lines.
Also, Sunshine is about A HOLIDAY RESORT ON AN ISLAND which you'd know if you actually played the damn game. It's right there in the intro cinematic before the start screen.
https://www.mariowiki.com/Isle_Delfino
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kkfj31EUc8&ab_channel=AdDaRobNintendo
One more thing: stop using ellipsies in place of full stops. Here is the proper use of them:
https://www.grammarbook.com/punctuation/ellipses.asp#:~:text=An%20ellipsis%20(plural%3A%20ellipses),material%20that%20is%20less%20relevant.&text=Although%20ellipses%20are%20used%20in,dot%20method%20is%20the%20simplest.
Now read it.
Also Mario should still make sounds like he did in Mario 64 and Banjo's "talk" is too iconic to be changed...
What? Unironically using grammar in your argument to make you right? Is it 2008?
"WAAHHHH! THE MEAN BOY CALLED ME OUT ON BULLYING HIM AND NOW i'M TELLING!"
That is how you sound there.
I've reported you right back for trolling and being rude yourself in your opening text. All i did was call you out on you attacking me for having different opinions to you. You are just being toxic.
Sonic Adventure is simply a bad game with tons of glitches and a bad camera, it's just a simple fact.
SA1 DX has glitches. The original Dreamcast one and the DCC mod for PC do not. Also, it's camera is miles better than Mario 64 or Galaxy. I know this because I actually played the games on those platforms and saw for myself.
Opinions are not facts and never will be. LOOK IT UP. https://teachingcommons.lakeheadu.ca/fact-vs-opinion-resource
Whenever we simply express OUR opinions, you say we're wrong, argue with us constantly and resort to projection and running crying to the teacher when you've run out of insults.
You're a hypocrite.
I wish Sonic X-treme was released instead...
That's why I didn't include it in the comparison. Mario 64's one usually gets stuck on things and Galaxy's one is a crapshoot about whether the rotate camera controls will work in that specific area of the level or not.