Imagine , playing FPS with a controler ...

Nguyên văn bởi Ghoste:

Adding the panzer 4 next update simply for the hype. Screw realism right?

while this is true for some things (like the trenchgun) why do you think this about the pz4 it was the mainstay of the german panzer forces even at the end of the war lol and most definitly deserved to be in the game which would allow the panther to be buffed to where it belongs instead of it sitting at the lvl of a m4a3 75 and a t-34 model 1941 (because when the eastern front was added they "re-balanced" tanks based on there type rather then what they actually are) which it was statistically far superior to both.

Nguyên văn bởi Divi Iuli Filius:

Nguyên văn bởi SpaceXcstacy:

When can we get half tracks? Seems like you don't give a toss about the promises you make with your road maps. I remember when you promised to let us drive civilian vehicles, but you lied to all of your backers. Must be because you've made your money from PC and want to lure in some more suckers from console just before you abandon the game. How about you deliver on the promises of previous road maps before you end up getting slammed by the UK's ASA which has recently hammers CIG for their lies and broken promises!

I remember they mentioned flamethrowers. Nada.

Indeed. They want push console release on PS5 over adding the stuff they've promised. After PS5 they'll move to Xbox and after that they will most likely go dark and run off. Just like OWI the devs of Squad they piss on their community while pretending to care and offer gifts.

- what about the skin of objects not meeting its geometry leading to a endless number of invisible objects
- what about having to press jump 10 times to climb a 10 inch rock, faling tree, etc.
- what about players seeking tips online to improve grafics because the FPS drops constantly all the time, doesnt matter with specs they have. And before last update lots of stuttering. And even more on stalingrad.
- what about balance the game.... all the time squads with no squad leaders, and teams with no comanders (because thers no incentive to them)
- 3 panzershreck to kill a 76 mm with shoots to the back. WTF??
- what about seeing a giant square at distance that looks like a house.
- what about old rendering problems?? that have loots of ways to be solved
This game was way way way way way way way way way better 2 years ago..... its sad how bad the choices the devs made in this short period.

Nguyên văn bởi Eevee.exe:

Nguyên văn bởi Ghoste:

Adding the panzer 4 next update simply for the hype. Screw realism right?

while this is true for some things (like the trenchgun) why do you think this about the pz4 it was the mainstay of the german panzer forces even at the end of the war lol and most definitly deserved to be in the game which would allow the panther to be buffed to where it belongs instead of it sitting at the lvl of a m4a3 75 and a t-34 model 1941 (because when the eastern front was added they "re-balanced" tanks based on there type rather then what they actually are) which it was statistically far superior to both.

Did they really do that? That is horrendous.....
Remember when this was meant to be a 'historic' game?

Nguyên văn bởi EXD War Dog:

OL4K is right. I am one of the veterans playing since the launch of the game. I play tanks mostly. I really like the last changes about the tanks except one - the driving is utterly stupid now, it's not even realistic. A tank should be able to turn on its place on spot. I know what I am talking about as I drove a tank in real life.
And yes, I see so many players recently just playing to shoot people, nothing else. They don't communicate, don't follow squad leader's orders etc.

show me a sherman that can zero turn lololol

Nguyên văn bởi DerRitter:

Nguyên văn bởi Eevee.exe:

while this is true for some things (like the trenchgun) why do you think this about the pz4 it was the mainstay of the german panzer forces even at the end of the war lol and most definitly deserved to be in the game which would allow the panther to be buffed to where it belongs instead of it sitting at the lvl of a m4a3 75 and a t-34 model 1941 (because when the eastern front was added they "re-balanced" tanks based on there type rather then what they actually are) which it was statistically far superior to both.

Did they really do that? That is horrendous.....
Remember when this was meant to be a 'historic' game?

did i really do what? call a bad faith argument a bad faith argument? im sorry im not vindictive i called out the trenchgun for what it was (hype) but anyone calling out the pz4 as just hype is using a bad faith argument as described above it needs to be in the game for historical realism and anyone in my book deserves to be called out no matter how bad the person or group for using a bad faith argument. as doing so is what really is horrendous.......

As someone relatively new to HLL (I just started playing a few weeks ago and I'm really enjoying it right now), I'm utterly bewildered at how much toxicity and hate is present in this discussion..
Could anybody explain to me WHY exactly so many veteran players feel 'abandoned' by the HLL dev team?
From everything I've seen from the game, the devs have worked very hard for the game to be where it is today, comparing it to what it was a few years ago, it's come a long way, and this is coming from somebody new to the title.
Also, I'm pretty damn sure HLL doesn't claim to offer solid realism or a 100% realistic experience.
The majority of the complaints I'm seeing here have to do with historical accuracy in regards to infantry/tank divisions, such as uniforms, paint jobs, and also the maps themselves.
Were the original backers promised a super realistic WW2 game?
If so, I can understand.
if not, I really don't understand the hate.
At all.

Keep up the great work

Nguyên văn bởi china frog:

As someone relatively new to HLL (I just started playing a few weeks ago and I'm really enjoying it right now), I'm utterly bewildered at how much toxicity and hate is present in this discussion..
Could anybody explain to me WHY exactly so many veteran players feel 'abandoned' by the HLL dev team?
From everything I've seen from the game, the devs have worked very hard for the game to be where it is today, comparing it to what it was a few years ago, it's come a long way, and this is coming from somebody new to the title.
Also, I'm pretty damn sure HLL doesn't claim to offer solid realism or a 100% realistic experience.
The majority of the complaints I'm seeing here have to do with historical accuracy in regards to infantry/tank divisions, such as uniforms, paint jobs, and also the maps themselves.
Were the original backers promised a super realistic WW2 game?
If so, I can understand.
if not, I really don't understand the hate.
At all.

The hate is because they misled and abandoned their original financial supporters to create a game separate from it's original vision. If you cannot see the failures within the game currently present, play the game and find out yourself. We cannot open your eyes. However 99%+ of the players population throughout 2 years have uninstalled the game while new players get suckered into the paid dlc to feed the money hungry goblins. Ugly things really.

1 +Million sold yet 5k peak pop kek

Nguyên văn bởi Lord Saruman:

can anyone of the community please help me? As i think the devs dont understand i want more realistic manpower system as well a realisitc ticket or wave system for spawning

It will get no where, they broke their meta with 200m and it's going be a year strong in a few months. Devs don't listen, even when there's 50+ awarded threads with 270+ comments saying NO SHINY SPAWNS.

why markings for 15.PzD? that division wasnt even existent after 43

Nguyên văn bởi EXD War Dog:

OL4K is right. I am one of the veterans playing since the launch of the game. I play tanks mostly. I really like the last changes about the tanks except one - the driving is utterly stupid now, it's not even realistic. A tank should be able to turn on its place on spot. I know what I am talking about as I drove a tank in real life.
And yes, I see so many players recently just playing to shoot people, nothing else. They don't communicate, don't follow squad leader's orders etc.

neutral turning was limited to basically only german tanks during ww2, your abrams is a hell of a lot different from a sherman pal. most tank drivers were fresh recruits and couldnt perform a netural turn.

Nguyên văn bởi 0L4K:

Nguyên văn bởi Lord Saruman:

can anyone of the community please help me? As i think the devs dont understand i want more realistic manpower system as well a realisitc ticket or wave system for spawning

It will get no where, they broke their meta with 200m and it's going be a year strong in a few months. Devs don't listen, even when there's 50+ awarded threads with 270+ comments saying NO SHINY SPAWNS.

dude doesnt own the game another one of Ralphs account, paid DLC isnt even game breaking, and paid faction isnt even confirmed yet,

Nguyên văn bởi china frog:

As someone relatively new to HLL (I just started playing a few weeks ago and I'm really enjoying it right now), I'm utterly bewildered at how much toxicity and hate is present in this discussion..
Could anybody explain to me WHY exactly so many veteran players feel 'abandoned' by the HLL dev team?
From everything I've seen from the game, the devs have worked very hard for the game to be where it is today, comparing it to what it was a few years ago, it's come a long way, and this is coming from somebody new to the title.
Also, I'm pretty damn sure HLL doesn't claim to offer solid realism or a 100% realistic experience.
The majority of the complaints I'm seeing here have to do with historical accuracy in regards to infantry/tank divisions, such as uniforms, paint jobs, and also the maps themselves.
Were the original backers promised a super realistic WW2 game?
If so, I can understand.
if not, I really don't understand the hate.
At all.

https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/blackmatter/hell-let-loose