Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский)
Español - Latinoamérica (латиноам. испанский)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский)
Português-Brasil (бразильский португальский)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
I guess you had a really bad match and came here to vent, which is fine. Not all matches can go how we want it though, just remember that.
and the devs have lowkey , and sometime openly added that fuel, to that fire.
Aside from that I can't imagine people who aren't paying attention in game are gonna make effort to read the forums either..
*CAW CAW CAAAAWWWs *w* <3 away from here (❁´◡`❁)*
actually it's because I knew skirmish was just proof this game is going to never get back to what the game was.
Literally the biggest issue in this game is a lack of understanding how it's strategically played. Which amounts to a simple concept. Garrisons.
So they add a mode with no garrisons? Pretty much just saying they only care about attracting more income by trying to appeal to CoD and BF types. Selling skins and adding "variety" in the form of game modes. Rather then strengthening the actual format of the game.
As for cheaters, yes the situation does appear to be getting worse, only takes a couple of ESp or Aimbotters to completely ruin a match, very often now see locked infantry squads with two very low level players with the highest offence score, like over a 1000 score for a level 9 player is impossible without cheating.