Is it just me that thinks the matches are too long?

[Zlatje]

I have some 250h in this game 550h in Squad. I love HLL atmosphere and all, but I always tend to get extremely bored playing 1h 30 min games. 9/10 games end when 1h 30 min has passed and not thanks to one team capping all objectives.

Is it just me that hate hammering the last cap, or defending it for 30 or even sometimes 1h before the time runs out? The reason I can play Squad a lot more is because there is a timer AND tickets!! You can dominate caps, but still lose because of tickets. Games on Squad could be 20-1h, sure, but if you are dominating the other team the game ends quickly. You are not sitting there looking at 45min timer counting down while spawn camping.

Is it just me?

[TWB*Clell_Miller]

You bet. June 6 1944. "Whistle blows. Okay guys, were one hour into it. Everybody cease fire and have a beer." Go away....

[Stryker]

In my opinion, it would be nice if there would be no timer - just objectives to capture to win.
Or even more time than just 1hr30 min.

I am playing as Engineer pretty often. Sometimes when I am putting up some defense buildings with other engineers (with driving supply trucks to the front, waiting for airdropped supplies, etc.) it seems that 1hr30min isn't is enough. time runs out too fast.

[niaerniopawrjnko]

I agree, imagine getting home from work and then just wanting to relax, no way in hell Im going to sit and play ONE match which lasts over an hour.

[Zlatje]

Originally posted by niaerniopawrjnko:

I agree, imagine getting home from work and then just wanting to relax, no way in hell Im going to sit and play ONE match which lasts over an hour.

I guess that is what it comes down to. Playing WoW when I was 15, 10h was nothing. Now over 1h games are too long and I often tend to leave.

Since BF2041 sucks, I guess I will see what MW2 has to offer.

[DrewDaddy]

The long games tend to be the more satisfying ones. Certainly better than the 15-20 min steamrolls.

[Blitz4]

2H30 for offensive
1H30 for warfare

yea they're way too long
should be 1H tops.

Squad is about 1H iirc

[FMAN]

i dint know a battle in war only last it an hour or 30 mins

[impish]

They feel a bit short. Longer times would weed out the wannabees.

[Marty_]

I like them the way they are.

[POPO Sandh]

As a Tf2 player who plays on 2fort everytime the match length in HLL is fine.

[Abacus]

One of the primary things I love about this game:
NO TICKETS!
(they need to go back to the original Redeployment IMO.)

Squad remains fresh for a HUGE reason this game lack....content. This game is SO limited in what we actually have to do. Remagen is a great example of the maps outpacing what equipment one would prioritize.

IE: Flame throwers, and fire-based armor. Charging a bridge exclusively with riflemen and nothing else really (no light AT, grenade rifles, marksmen.) is just a boring grind. PS ad RO 1+2 already have more.

Squad seems incomparable, but they have what they have. HLL lacks much of what they had available to tackle many situations in a more logical and realistic way in that era.

I mean, ironically Squad released amphibious vehicles recently. While HLL released a map where there was no solution...just night and ammo?

[Cruddy]

I've been saying this forever, an hour and 30 min is awful match time and it's very easy to get stuck in a losing position for the entirety of the match. That's why I prefer offensive, it has the potential to be much shorter and requires less of the team to have a brain.

[high anxiety]

Originally posted by B:

One of the primary things I love about this game:
NO TICKETS!
(they need to go back to the original Redeployment IMO.)

Squad remains fresh for a HUGE reason this game lack....content. This game is SO limited in what we actually have to do. Remagen is a great example of the maps outpacing what equipment one would prioritize.

IE: Flame throwers, and fire-based armor. Charging a bridge exclusively with riflemen and nothing else really (no light AT, grenade rifles, marksmen.) is just a boring grind. PS ad RO 1+2 already have more.

Squad seems incomparable, but they have what they have. HLL lacks much of what they had available to tackle many situations in a more logical and realistic way in that era.

I mean, ironically Squad released amphibious vehicles recently. While HLL released a map where there was no solution...just night and ammo?

squad has also been in development for 4 years longer than HLL

[SaltyBalls]

Originally posted by Nohotz:

I have some 250h in this game 550h in Squad. I love HLL atmosphere and all, but I always tend to get extremely bored playing 1h 30 min games. 9/10 games end when 1h 30 min has passed and not thanks to one team capping all objectives.

Is it just me that hate hammering the last cap, or defending it for 30 or even sometimes 1h before the time runs out? The reason I can play Squad a lot more is because there is a timer AND tickets!! You can dominate caps, but still lose because of tickets. Games on Squad could be 20-1h, sure, but if you are dominating the other team the game ends quickly. You are not sitting there looking at 45min timer counting down while spawn camping.

Is it just me?

For everyone crying matches are too long go play cod then

[bakepotatou]

you'll never get matches that flow while this game retains this mutant bastard love-child of arcade shooter and realism squad shooter. smh