Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Specific targets had specific calculated setting for the guns to hit, which were known by the crews. If a target outside those predetermined coordinates was designated, that location data was given to the artillery commander by a forward observer (that had estimated data based on observation.) That semi inaccurate data was then fed to an artillery commander who used a combination of pre established tables, and calculations that were done by an analog calculating device to determine the the correct coordinates. Then they would send fire, and hope is right.
Which is not the same as having ever square meter of an area mapped with easily accessible coordinates. let alone having those coordinates being fed to you by a computer system with the processing power that is equal to 100's of thousands, if not, millions of times faster than any human. So that argument that they had tables is stupid.
Lets compare it to something else.
If I am an AT rocketeer, and I have a program that gives me the exact elevation I need to shoot the rocket to hit a target, that would be cheating. I defy you to say otherwise.
The real crux of this is, people are using tools not provided by the game to gain an advantage.
I couldn't play a competitive chess match using a computer to tell me my moves and say "well, every move of chess is already mapped, so why not have this tool to make my life easier?"
If you use something outside what is provided within the confounds of the game you are playing, you are cheating.
If you take a look at the Flak88 and other duel purpose guns Arty becomes even more Deadly than HLL. Again these guys all knew the range tables by heart or learned them dam quick.
But if you want to talk about reality, this is a video game, right?
Answer this.
If anyone uses tools, such as software, that are not provided by the game, which gives someone an advantage over other players that are solely playing the game as is, they are cheating, are they not?
Give me a scenario outside of this specific issue in which that description of activity is not cheating.
Because jut telling me how WWII was, has nothing to do with if someone is cheating in video game.
So no, not cheating, but hilariously less efficient than using in game tools
ADA/disabilities software. Tobii eye tracking for people that can't use their hands very well.
All of these are 3rd party synthetic input software. The game cannot tell the difference between Bob Ninefingers using a special keyboard to have one key send multiple bindings or click the mouse, and Robert NoobPwner using similar software to move the mouse vertical against recoil.
This is an uphill battle fought for 20 years. Windows can flag keystrokes as synthetic, and the games can see this, but you can't disable them or you eliminate Bob and all the legitimate users.
That is legitimately about as best an argument that can be given. Thing is, that is a hardware advantage that no reasonable person can argue against. You can't define what keyboard or mouse someone has, only that they function in a specific way. Move mouse right, curser moves right.
For example, I can, and do, change my DPS on the fly through my mouse. Sensitivity can be changed by anyone at any time through settings. I have a mouse that allows me to change those setting everyone has access too on the fly. What I can't program my mouse to do, is automatically, or for this argument, guide me where to shoot to hit a target.
It's not hardware, it's software, and it's absolutely zero difference on the OS level as something like AHK. Don't get me started on AHK... the sky is the limit, if you understand basic C+ you can automate anything.
Thing is all of this is software and seen as driver level input to the OS, and the game. It's flagged as synthetic, but the game won't blacklist this or it risks ADA issues with legitimate usage of synthetic input on a PC.
Because, again, this is a video game, not real life, and the fact it, someone is using tools not provided to other players to gain an advantage.
Can you please comment on that? Do you think players, in a video game, regardless of historical context (or whatever,) are not cheating if they use software that is not part of the game to gain an advantage?