Kursk feedback

[Murell]

PLS remove IS1 and STG44 from Kursk,and change G43 to G41.

[Beans]

Ooooo another leak. Very weird you can use an STG44, G43, and the IS-1 when they weren’t even available or even in production at the time battle of Kursk. Very weird for a realistic game I might add. This should ruffle a lot of peoples feathers. Or perhaps it’ll change due to PTE and no released yet.

[Somua]

@Beans well ... to be fair HLL is far to be a realistic game.

[Beans]

Originally posted by DeathKorps:

@Beans well ... to be fair HLL is far to be a realistic game.

It is advertised and described by the creators as being realistic on many different platforms and social media places. I am just implying what they say the game is, which it’s not. I know everything can’t be 100% real but there should be a threshold, like RO2 level and maybe a bit more.

[Floringer]

maybe those things are just placeholders, it is a PTE after all

[Pan_de]

Originally posted by Beans:

Originally posted by DeathKorps:

@Beans well ... to be fair HLL is far to be a realistic game.

It is advertised and described by the creators as being realistic on many different platforms and social media places. I am just implying what they say the game is, which it’s not. I know everything can’t be 100% real but there should be a threshold, like RO2 level and maybe a bit more.

I mean didnt they also advertise flamethrowers? Who would think a game with flamethrowers is gonna be super realistic ;)

[Ξ PriestInPeril]

the game was quite realistic until update 6...when 76 jumbo could 2 tap a tiger from any distance...
and then they started to add more SMGs as additional loadout to almost all roles...now you can potentially have an entire unit with 3 BARs and 3 tommy guns...thats just not right...

i simply miss the old days when everyone was using Kar98 or M1, and only few roles had access to SMGs...

[vJIG SAW]

Originally posted by PriestInPeril:

the game was quite realistic until update 6...when 76 jumbo could 2 tap a tiger from any distance...
and then they started to add more SMGs as additional loadout to almost all roles...now you can potentially have an entire unit with 3 BARs and 3 tommy guns...thats just not right...

i simply miss the old days when everyone was using Kar98 or M1, and only few roles had access to SMGs...

+1

[Roninman]

Originally posted by Kaga:

PLS remove IS1 and STG44 from Kursk,and change G43 to G41.

Are you sure about this its Kursk or not some later battle? They shouldnt have even T34-85 at Kursk and germans definately no STG44

[Beans]

Originally posted by Roninman:

Originally posted by Kaga:

PLS remove IS1 and STG44 from Kursk,and change G43 to G41.

Are you sure about this its Kursk or not some later battle? They shouldnt have even T34-85 at Kursk and germans definately no STG44

Haven’t you read any briefs or pte info? It’s Kursk.

[Beans]

Originally posted by PriestInPeril:

the game was quite realistic until update 6...when 76 jumbo could 2 tap a tiger from any distance...
and then they started to add more SMGs as additional loadout to almost all roles...now you can potentially have an entire unit with 3 BARs and 3 tommy guns...thats just not right...

i simply miss the old days when everyone was using Kar98 or M1, and only few roles had access to SMGs...

+ 1, the devs have strayed far away from this

[Roninman]

Originally posted by Beans:

Originally posted by Roninman:

Are you sure about this its Kursk or not some later battle? They shouldnt have even T34-85 at Kursk and germans definately no STG44

Haven’t you read any briefs or pte info? It’s Kursk.

Not, sometimes checked pics only. Are they insane now literally?

[TWB*Clell_Miller]

MKb-42(h) instead of Stg-44. There were semi-auto rifles available for both sides in 1942 and 1943. But the G43 didn't show up until after Kursk. The IS 1 or IS 2 is simply out of the question. Even the t-34 85 wasn't available yet. I understand the T-43 was available in some numbers, but the principal adversary was still some variant of t-34 76 Keep in mind that in spite of the presence of pzkw V and VI, the Russians employed vast numbers of their 76mm AT guns in layered ambush groups miles deep. These became such a problem that the Germans had to resort to the "glock" (bell) tank formation in an effort to deal with this. I'd like to see operational formations of the Soviet AT 76 on at least one of the maps. It would be very representative of the situation.

[Beans]

Originally posted by Roninman:

Originally posted by Beans:

Haven’t you read any briefs or pte info? It’s Kursk.

Not, sometimes checked pics only. Are they insane now literally?

I guess so lol. Someone said there’s STG44’s, Gewher 43’s, and IS-1’s on the Kursk map, man it really is weird and crazy. None of these things were in production or in combat during at the time of Kursk. To be fair we did see how crazy the devs went when adding Jumbos.

[Beans]

Originally posted by TWB*Clell_Miller:

MKb-42(h) instead of Stg-44. There were semi-auto rifles available for both sides in 1942 and 1943. But the G43 didn't show up until after Kursk. The IS 1 or IS 2 is simply out of the question. Even the t-34 85 wasn't available yet. I understand the T-43 was available in some numbers, but the principal adversary was still some variant of t-34 76 Keep in mind that in spite of the presence of pzkw V and VI, the Russians employed vast numbers of their 76mm AT guns in layered ambush groups miles deep. These became such a problem that the Germans had to resort to the "glock" (bell) tank formation in an effort to deal with this. I'd like to see operational formations of the Soviet AT 76 on at least one of the maps. It would be very representative of the situation.

Doubt their gonna change having all these unrealistic things. They could care less about small stuff like this.

[Burning Bubbles]

The Devs already stated that the Pre 1944 German content hasn't been completed or even started yet. The IS series of tanks however is quite weird.