WOW so all the DLC's sucks ass to this game if you looks at the reviews

[Clone303]

so guess it's true

[𝕊𝕠𝕡𝕙𝕚𝕒]

https://steamcommunity.com/app/678960/discussions/0/2277079183727908519/
why do you necro this again ??? what is your problem?
you dont even have game on acount .

[Clone303]

Originally posted by snowy:

https://steamcommunity.com/app/678960/discussions/0/2277079183727908519/
why do you necro this again ??? what is your problem?
you dont even have game on acount .

well that is because im smart and i get the info about the games before i buy them most times :P but yea i dont own it yet and i played the Demo and im not one wtih the problem :P

[Noco]

Originally posted by Clone303:

Originally posted by snowy:

https://steamcommunity.com/app/678960/discussions/0/2277079183727908519/
why do you necro this again ??? what is your problem?
you dont even have game on acount .

well that is because im smart and i get the info about the games before i buy them most times :P but yea i dont own it yet and i played the Demo and im not one wtih the problem :P

What you said makes no sense, you didn't play the DLC's nor the Game itself to the end.
The opinion on the Game and DLC's of yours, has no value.
It's always good to check reviews before you buy a Game but you should also read them and see what's it all about. Ignore the one line ones, they mostly add nothing insightful anyways.

People did expect too much and got upset, that's basically what did happen. True, if you compare the Masterpiece base Game to them, they do feel bad in comparison, yet they are on their own good as they are.
They added all the things everyone did desire in one or another way but with expectations so incredibly unreal, it was bound to happen, like it did.
If you go one step further and see the "value" you did get for a plain season pass, it's well worth the price - even at the full price.
I highly suggest to you, to play the Game fully, get the DLC's too (during sale atm too) and make up your own opinion on how "bad" everything is instead to listen to follow the screams..

[Clone303]

Originally posted by Noco:

Originally posted by Clone303:

well that is because im smart and i get the info about the games before i buy them most times :P but yea i dont own it yet and i played the Demo and im not one wtih the problem :P

What you said makes no sense, you didn't play the DLC's nor the Game itself to the end.
The opinion on the Game and DLC's of yours, has no value.
It's always good to check reviews before you buy a Game but you should also read them and see what's it all about. Ignore the one line ones, they mostly add nothing insightful anyways.

People did expect too much and got upset, that's basically what did happen. True, if you compare the Masterpiece base Game to them, they do feel bad in comparison, yet they are on their own good as they are.
They added all the things everyone did desire in one or another way but with expectations so incredibly unreal, it was bound to happen, like it did.
If you go one step further and see the "value" you did get for a plain season pass, it's well worth the price - even at the full price.
I highly suggest to you, to play the Game fully, get the DLC's too (during sale atm too) and make up your own opinion on how "bad" everything is instead to listen to follow the screams..

there you are wrong, every Opinion is right and if you like or dislike a game ONLY take 30min to 1 hour to see if it's any good also why should pay for bad DLC's when most people give a bad review then it's bad :P other thing wtih the game

[warlok]

Originally posted by Clone303:

there you are wrong, every Opinion is right and if you like or dislike a game ONLY take 30min to 1 hour to see if it's any good also why should pay for bad DLC's when most people give a bad review then it's bad :P other thing wtih the game

Some opinions are based on incomplete or outright incorrect information and thus hold no real value.
Good luck judging quality of big open worlds, rpgs and story driven games in 30 minutes.
Most people apparently gave Fallout 76 a positive review. Are you going to argue that it's a good game now?

[Clone303]

Originally posted by warlok:

Originally posted by Clone303:

there you are wrong, every Opinion is right and if you like or dislike a game ONLY take 30min to 1 hour to see if it's any good also why should pay for bad DLC's when most people give a bad review then it's bad :P other thing wtih the game

Some opinions are based on incomplete or outright incorrect information and thus hold no real value.
Good luck judging quality of big open worlds, rpgs and story driven games in 30 minutes.
Most people apparently gave Fallout 76 a positive review. Are you going to argue that it's a good game now?

easy, you do that wtih every game :P i self play Fallout 76 and it's boring but the game itself is fine, better pick is Fallout 4 for it has everything...... well in fact the game is great, just nothing to do in Fallout 76 XD for it's missing the story and if comes on sale on Steam like 75% then even self maybe buy it but im not going to buy anything ingame for real money

[Dekar_Serverbot]

Comparing Fallout 4 with Skyrim is like comparing Dragon Age 2 with Zelda Breath of the Wild.

Fallout 4 writting is poor, full of plotholes, lackluster and leaves the protagonist with a "I am a badass that can decimate armies, yet i just live to serve and make sarcastic one liners. I am forced to make decisions and everything because i am surrounded by idiotic selfish lazybums who can't clean their asses. Also, no matter what i do, it has no consecuence". While Zelda breath of the wild has no story to follow and you just roam around the world surviving like in terraria style.

The only difference is that bethesda can't write npc's without either them being carbon copies of either real life people or previous entries (yeah, not gonna lie, ulfric and hitler are the same, even ulfric himself is smaller than other nords)

[Zaskar]

Originally posted by Noco:

People did expect too much and got upset, that's basically what did happen. True, if you compare the Masterpiece base Game to them, they do feel bad in comparison, yet they are on their own good as they are.
They added all the things everyone did desire in one or another way but with expectations so incredibly unreal, it was bound to happen, like it did.
If you go one step further and see the "value" you did get for a plain season pass, it's well worth the price - even at the full price.

That's BS. The DLCs problems are far from being the expectations of the players. Almost every "new" items are reskin of base game items. Absolutely no new clothes. The DLCs are just three linear and easy depth maps with a lot of base game reskin. Absolutely every monsters in the DLCs(outside the bosses) are base game monsters.The first boss is decent, the second one is quite annoying and the third one is horrible despite having cool looking attacks.

The issue with the DLCs isn't the players expectation but the laziness of the developpers.

Base game was good despite having some issues, for sure. But I can't understand how you can deny that the three DLCs are bad. They are definetely not worth the full price.

I'm sure "all the things everyone did desire" wasn't reskinned items, small maps filled with base game enemies that you already killed 500 times and decent to annoying bosses.

[Supreme Hentai System Lord]

DLC bad for Price.

[Clone303]

Originally posted by Dekar_Serverbot:

Comparing Fallout 4 with Skyrim is like comparing Dragon Age 2 with Zelda Breath of the Wild.

Fallout 4 writting is poor, full of plotholes, lackluster and leaves the protagonist with a "I am a badass that can decimate armies, yet i just live to serve and make sarcastic one liners. I am forced to make decisions and everything because i am surrounded by idiotic selfish lazybums who can't clean their asses. Also, no matter what i do, it has no consecuence". While Zelda breath of the wild has no story to follow and you just roam around the world surviving like in terraria style.

The only difference is that bethesda can't write npc's without either them being carbon copies of either real life people or previous entries (yeah, not gonna lie, ulfric and hitler are the same, even ulfric himself is smaller than other nords)

no, its ♥♥♥♥ awesome and who cares abiut main story anyways? XD the side quests are the best and by far the funny one yet

[Clone303]

Originally posted by Sabishii:

Naw, Fallout 4 was bad, Game Engine was just Skyrim Mark 2, RPG Elements were Watered down, Voice acting that nobody asked for.

Just a bad game all around, but at least it wasn't as bad as 76 which took like 1 whole year just to add npcs.

nope, Fallout 4 engine is upgrade alot vs Skyrim and Fallout 4 has many RPG has you want :P or get even more if you add mods but Skyrim has alot of Watered down things, Skyrim's skitty vs Oblivon

[tracksone]

As a fan of fallout, i own them all on console.... 4 is the worst fallout game. I dont consider 76 as a game. But 4 is not fallout. Zero fans of fallout will tell you its the best one.

[Clone303]

Originally posted by ⎛⎝ Yes ⎠⎞:

Originally posted by Clone303:

nope, Fallout 4 engine is upgrade alot vs Skyrim and Fallout 4 has many RPG has you want :P or get even more if you add mods but Skyrim has alot of Watered down things, Skyrim's skitty vs Oblivon

Uh.
You can mod RPG elements into Skyrim too, and it has a lot more mods.
Fallout 4 has ♥♥♥♥ optimization and a ♥♥♥♥♥♥ engine but that's because Bethesda insists on using outdated engines all the time.
I find it mildly amusing that you mention Oblivion as a comparison too because Oblivion is the game where the watering down really started and it went downhill.
Morrowind was the last Bethesda game that really was an in depth RPG experience, their games after that were just a swimming pool with the depth of a paddling pool.

Comparing the engine of Fallout 4 to Skyrim is like comparing two turds.
They're still just two turds even if one smells slightly less worse than the other.

Edit: Also, why did this need a thread?

nope it's not but Skyrim is, LOL Fallout 4 is great optimization dude but Skyrim is not, nope that is oblivon and Faloout 4 there has depth RPG experience, just need to use your head to see them.............. why did this need a thread because it need one :P

[Clone303]

Originally posted by tracksone:

As a fan of fallout, i own them all on console.... 4 is the worst fallout game. I dont consider 76 as a game. But 4 is not fallout. Zero fans of fallout will tell you its the best one.

well then you are the most fakest one of them all :P for Fallout 4 is the best, far more choose in it then Fallout 3 and New vegas but yea it miss more evil chooses, the wore one is New Vegas it has so many bugs and so easy to bug the quests out :P and wrong again im Fallout fan, i only play FPS of them from Fallout 3 to 4 and Fallout 4 has everything Fallout 3 did miss

[Stinkhole]

FYI fallout 4 has a texture mod that add way better texture on the landscape of all the game while running better than the vanilla ones...

Also no, fallout 4 is far from the best fallout (even if I have more than 1k hours on it lol). Hell I would even argue that f3 and f4 are just a goofy interpretation of what the universe of fallout was meant to be, hence why new vegas' writing is praised a lot. Because people actually behave and talk like normal people would do in this world.