Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I would suggest the thinker archetype for a first playthrough then the sensitive archetype for a second
the thinker is the archetype that most feels like a detective, opening lots of dialogue options connected to the resolution of the crime and also to understand the game's lore and world
the sensitive archetype opens dialogue options to survey your character past and present presenting a better undestanding of your human condition
The best first playthrough is pretty much whatever character you make, based on the stats and skills that interest you. This game changes a lot based on what you do.
On subsequent playthroughs I ignored Thinker and focused on Sensitive and Physical skills. It was a completely different game lol.
Bollocks. Political thoughts often have negligible or nonexistent downsides. In fact, almost ALL thoughts have negligible downsides with a few exceptions. The Precarious World is a balanced thought, for example. And Wasteland of Reality's downside is huge, but it can singlehandedly change the game if you internalize it.
Encyclopedia is worth picking to get more lore from the game/