Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The item ID is "jacket_pissflaubert" (https://discoelysium.fandom.com/wiki/Leather_Jacket_Pissf****t). And when you talk with Pissf****t in the Final Cut, one of his lines isn't buzzed out. He says it there, Pissflaubert.
Cuno does also say f*g at one point, and one time Glen (one of the Hardie Boys) says it and it's uncensored, so that does make me think it's less about whether or not it offends anybody and more about the drawing attention to the censorship itself, in a meta sense.
A slur only has power if you give it power. Offence is always taken, never given. If a person decides to be intentionally offensive it speaks more about them than it does about you. I can not for the life of me understand why anyone gets upset about words. It’s just air from miscreants acting in bad faith.
There’s a great deal of things in this world one can be upset with - the opinions of someone who maliciously slurs at others should be WAAAY at the bottom of the list, especially in a work of fiction. Cuno is a good example of this; Do you really take anything that kid says seriously?
Yeah, this is the real reason. The theory about the 'flaubert' or censorship being some kind of an in-joke is nice, but it's just a theory. You can clearly hear the actual word they are saying in-game a couple times that accidentally got left uncensored, and it's exactly what you think it is.
Yes. I'd been following the development of this game since years before it came out, and shortly before the original release I remember explanations that it did not start off censored, but ended up as such due to feedback they received from testers pre-release. Don't know if it was screened to queer audience specifically or just a random selection of people, but there you go.
Not comparable. It's the difference between punching up vs punching down. Sure, "gay people" is not some kind of monolith that will always have a unified opinion - no group is. But we live in a world where in some parts of it being gay is an actual life or death risk, still, and even in parts of the world that are less harsh in that regard, hearing a real-life slur can be triggering to people who had traumatic experiences around it. If 'censoring' it can make playing the game more palatable to them, it's just a respectful and considerate thing to do with no real trade-off to speak of.
You can wax philosophical all you want about whether words have power to offend if you don't give them that power etc., and it's a potentially valid theoretical argument, but the thing is, in real life having the power to decide whether to be offended by something is already a luxury, because if you belong to a group that's being regularly targeted based on who they are (whether it'd be orientation, race, nationality etc), usually words are not the final stop. Words are a red flag, a signifier of worse things to come that puts you on guard that you are now unsafe and targeted. They are too intertwined with traumatic experiences around them, and hardly something that most people seek to re-experience when playing a game. Bleeping them out (which is not even the same as actual 'censoring', seeing they are not actually removed from in-game universe) just helps to prevent that direct-trigger reaction. All it is, is the game extending the same basic empathy to a certain group of its players as it does to its in-game characters.
The western world has gone rather insane these days however, in more extreme examples, situations where law enforcement is needed, it's extremely racist, against white people.
A random hypothetical situation but simple to understand, if i'm attacked on the street by black people, and I call the police, the police will arrest me and their questions will be maliciously worded to try and catch me out in some kind of racist loophole where I can be charged for a crime.
Plenty of horror stories of the same story structure with the difference between sexual assault male x female, it's treated extremely severely and the woman is always to be believed.
Male x male sexual assault however? get lauged at for being so sensitive and if you push it too far you get accused of homophobia, keep pushing, you get charged with a "hate crime".
TL:DR - Sure, being alpha about it is the right attitude, but this double standard of abuse now has the backing of the government, alpha attitude just makes government angry with you.
So the censorship is part of the story, basically, and you have the power to learn and remove it.
Perhaps you didn't read my earlier reply where I clearly meant and included the qualifier "In works of fiction*. I guess I assumed people had read and followed this entire thread, which isn't necessarily the case. It shouldn't be necessary to keep repeating yourself.
This is a work of fiction. The player is an observer and isn't controlling what those delinquent children are saying. It's not directed at anyone in real life but reflects reality. There's a very big difference. I can tell you something: denying reality is even more offensive. That's like denying that colonial powers committed genocide or that sexism and racism exist. Maybe it's those that prefer to think or pretend they don't exist that are the ones who prefer censorship. I think the ugliness that exists around us should be seen and heard as a means of exposing it. But I don't think I understand most people.
As I also said earlier (in case you didn't read it), censorship isn't at all effective as a means of combating intolerance, but only serves to disenfranchise those who are actually affected in my opinion. It gives the word and ideas more power by implying that they're dangerous and fearful! But this generally applies to works of fiction for an adult audience who should have the cognitive ability to make such distinctions. Perhaps I'm too generous in assuming that most adults do.
There simply should have just been a option at the start of the game to censor it for you if you choose it. I never asked to be 'protected' by the censors.
I dunno what that thought is, maybe the "Homosexual Underground" one?
I can't find anything that tells me what thought, but reddit and steam replies both say it can be turned off in game with the right thought unlocked.