Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Discussions Rules and Guidelines
Report this post
she later breaks their hold on work day and kills the rest of the staff where she plans to test for all eternitiy
I am totally sure that the Black Mesa incident was too much for them, when they noticed that they were totally incomunicated with the exterior and they tryed to scape. And for that reason nobody was able to stop GLaDOS to kill everyone. In fact the unique guy that just didn't scape was Rattman. He scaped from neurotoxins, but GLaDOS doesn't use more neurotoxins just because he didn't scape later evidently. After destroying the morality core GLaDOS wanted to kill CHell inmmediately with neurotoxins, when she scaped in portal 2 she used neurotoxins too. That stupid idea about the morality core that just worked partially is silly, it worked perfectly. I repeat that neurotoxins were build to control the scientists. Even before GLaDOS was build. She used it as soon as she was activated but they survived the first time, then they developed the morality core and it worked perfectly. It is totally evident.
But system granted the use of neurotoxins just in the case of one uprising. And that happened with the Black Mesa incident.
In fact, all indicates that part of those that tryed to scape, prefered to scape glados by entering theirselfs in the secret room full of criostasis chambers and very far of her territory.
PD: Portal 2 finished. We could see more staff through the movie, and that movie will be about half-life 2 too, but you wont see nothing more. So please, stop imaging Portal 3 endings and enyoy what you have in front of you, because trully, Portal 2 has a perfect ending.
PDII: When could people stop using the word "theory"? its ridiculous to pretend that you are saying theories. Portal 2 is full of info, so if what you say appear inside the ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ game, you are just describing a fact. Therefore, you are not creating any theory. One theory could be if you say what happened to Rattman, personally I think that he died on the Moon when GLaDOS recovered the control and she sent him there. BUT, at less, my theory is based in one fact, that picture on the Moon surface showing a companion cube there.
But man, the games are full of information to reach what I said about how GLaDOS killed to everyone. If you can't see it you are just blind. And all that is not a theory is what you can understand by using the whole facts, I said FACTS no theories, inside the game.
This is just a simple concept A+B+C. You can't make theories when what you have are facts. It could be a theory if those facts could change each day. But those facts are there, and are still there. My conclussions could be wrong, but just if you can find any new fact that I haven't seen yet. Just that could force me to reach other conclussions. But conclussions based in facts are not theories, conclussions could be good or wrong. But I repeat it depends of finding new facts from the games or in new games. Until that day, what we have now, show us an unique solution. And no body can creat a theory about that solution. We can only describe it by using their facts.
However what people do, and makes these terms so confusing is take just one or two facts, forgot about 2782329837 facts more around the game, and start building a whole story just focused in one single fact without having in mind those 2782329837 facts around.
And when you say them "you are wrong" they start saying ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ about "this is my theory if you are not agree build your own theory". And then you say them "Man you are wrong for this for this and for this", and they say SHUT UP!!! Are you idiot? that is ridiculous."
What it is ridiculous is pretending that I am wrong because you don't want to use the Game facts. When pretending that Portal 2 leves things without answers. Trick here it is not imagine stupid things, here the trick is have in mind as many facts as possible and just describe objetive conclussions based on those facts. That is the unique real way to understand not only any game but books and movies too. You are not there to imagin you are there to understand a story. And that story is a fact itself.
So trully, and this will shock you because I am sure that you think that I am saying the opposite, continue imaging possible portal continuations but not endings, I am totally sure that you like do that, and that is fine. Its good if you want develope your imagination. I do the same with Half-Life 3 but use the game facts to build your imagination. And accept their facts. You can imagine what could Chell do later. But Portal 2 was ended correctly. No chances for Chell to return to GLaDOS just pain, and a probably horrible death by aliens if no torture by the combine. With lucky she will find some humans and she will be protected by them in the best of cases. But here like you can see there is a theory based in facts. It is a theory because we have facts that aims to three possible continuations. I wish the best for CHell, but its a fact that combine found aperture science later. And with that tech they build the citadel. Problem is if they found it with the Wheatley help, or with the Chell help. Wishing the best for Chell I could prefer Wheatley help. But that is just my preference. And that is not based in a fact, for that reason it is a theory.
But trully if you describe facts of a game, and your conlussions are based in the whole facts, You just describes what happens in a game, you are not making a theory.
So stop saying this is my theory because you just described what you can see in the game every single time that you open the game. Because you used part of the facts. I used more facts for adding what I added. But that doesn't measn that I am wrong at all, and that doesn't means that you are wrong. That just means that you need more time to notice more facts than me. And I need probably notice more facts that maybe will change my conclussions. But people must stop using that stupid concept about "My Theory" because you just are using in a wrong way that concept. This is a game with an amaizing story, and you can't make a theory about what its happening in the game.
PDIII: And please do not use the joker card trying to convince me that I am just an arrogant person for thinking that I am right and you are wrong. I am tired of that ♥♥♥♥. This is what I think, and I have shared with you my reasons to think so. This is a forum, if you want try to show me reasons to think that I am wrong and you can convince me, I will feel pleasure to change my mind.
If you has not nothing to say, but you are not agree with me, just keep in silence and move away.
She could use neurotoxins during "Bring your daughter to work day", because they allowed her to use it during "Bring your cat to work day" as an experiment. They just trusted her enough.
False, check the comic and the aperture science web.
Chek it yourself man, you will belive your own eyes much more than my words, I said you the places where you must find that info. Or at least most part of the whole info.