Keep fighting the good fight, fellas.

[Bee]

This is not the kind of game I'm typically interested in, but I bought it and support you all the way.

When the usual "game journalism" slime started with their typical hunt for "problematics," I knew I was going to buy it. These people and their "I support free expression, BUT..." and their "I'm all for sexual content in gaming, HOWEVER..." puts an itch in my butt, and makes me more than willing to pay a little cash to spite them.

You're obviously the target of a SJW campaign. When Steam gets a pile of complaints, they have to figure the public objection is 10x that. But they're wrong, it's just a couple of forums organizing in their usual puritanical fashion. The lunatics' attention will wander and they'll find someone else to persecute. Keep doing what you want, and let the people vote with their wallets.

[KW]

Bee님이 먼저 게시:

This is not the kind of game I'm typically interested in, but I bought it and support you all the way.

When the usual "game journalism" slime started with their typical hunt for "problematics," I knew I was going to buy it. These people and their "I support free expression, BUT..." and their "I'm all for sexual content in gaming, HOWEVER..." puts an itch in my butt, and makes me more than willing to pay a little cash to spite them.

You're obviously the target of a SJW campaign. When Steam gets a pile of complaints, they have to figure the public objection is 10x that. But they're wrong, it's just a couple of forums organizing in their usual puritanical fashion. The lunatics' attention will wander and they'll find someone else to persecute. Keep doing what you want, and let the people vote with their wallets.

preach

[Evil_Befall]

Bee님이 먼저 게시:

This is not the kind of game I'm typically interested in, but I bought it and support you all the way.

When the usual "game journalism" slime started with their typical hunt for "problematics," I knew I was going to buy it. These people and their "I support free expression, BUT..." and their "I'm all for sexual content in gaming, HOWEVER..." puts an itch in my butt, and makes me more than willing to pay a little cash to spite them.

You're obviously the target of a SJW campaign. When Steam gets a pile of complaints, they have to figure the public objection is 10x that. But they're wrong, it's just a couple of forums organizing in their usual puritanical fashion. The lunatics' attention will wander and they'll find someone else to persecute. Keep doing what you want, and let the people vote with their wallets.

jesus thanks you my son

[Val]

Release PG version and provide AO patch!

Games like these should be as hardcore as hardcore porn.

[Evil_Befall]

Only Two Genders님이 먼저 게시:

Bee님이 먼저 게시:

This is not the kind of game I'm typically interested in, but I bought it and support you all the way.

When the usual "game journalism" slime started with their typical hunt for "problematics," I knew I was going to buy it. These people and their "I support free expression, BUT..." and their "I'm all for sexual content in gaming, HOWEVER..." puts an itch in my butt, and makes me more than willing to pay a little cash to spite them.

You're obviously the target of a SJW campaign. When Steam gets a pile of complaints, they have to figure the public objection is 10x that. But they're wrong, it's just a couple of forums organizing in their usual puritanical fashion. The lunatics' attention will wander and they'll find someone else to persecute. Keep doing what you want, and let the people vote with their wallets.

House Party was removed, yet that Dream Daddy: Pedophile Simulator 'game' goes unchecked.

i dont understand that game its like a gay simulator lol

[PocketYoda]

Thanks op we need more people like you.

[PocketYoda]

Only Two Genders님이 먼저 게시:

Bee님이 먼저 게시:

This is not the kind of game I'm typically interested in, but I bought it and support you all the way.

When the usual "game journalism" slime started with their typical hunt for "problematics," I knew I was going to buy it. These people and their "I support free expression, BUT..." and their "I'm all for sexual content in gaming, HOWEVER..." puts an itch in my butt, and makes me more than willing to pay a little cash to spite them.

You're obviously the target of a SJW campaign. When Steam gets a pile of complaints, they have to figure the public objection is 10x that. But they're wrong, it's just a couple of forums organizing in their usual puritanical fashion. The lunatics' attention will wander and they'll find someone else to persecute. Keep doing what you want, and let the people vote with their wallets.

House Party was removed, yet that Dream Daddy: Pedophile Simulator 'game' goes unchecked.

It has those agenda people pushing it not attacking it... At this time people can send whatever fake reports on a game they want.. and enough will bring a game down..

You too could play them at their own game and get a lot of people to report Daddy sim the same way as they did with house party, its really steams fault with bad mechanics that they never bother to monitor.

[Evil_Befall]

DanteYoda님이 먼저 게시:

Only Two Genders님이 먼저 게시:

House Party was removed, yet that Dream Daddy: Pedophile Simulator 'game' goes unchecked.

It has those agenda people pushing it not attacking it... At this time people can send whatever fake reports on a game they want.. and enough will bring a game down..

You too could play them at their own game and get a lot of people to report Daddy sim the same way as they did with house party, its really steams fault with bad mechanics that they never bother to monitor.

one of the reasons this was attacked because eek is a small company comparing to the gta or witcher ones and a easy target for these ppl

[PocketYoda]

Evil Befall님이 먼저 게시:

DanteYoda님이 먼저 게시:

It has those agenda people pushing it not attacking it... At this time people can send whatever fake reports on a game they want.. and enough will bring a game down..

You too could play them at their own game and get a lot of people to report Daddy sim the same way as they did with house party, its really steams fault with bad mechanics that they never bother to monitor.

one of the reasons this was attacked because eek is a small company comparing to the gta or witcher ones and a easy target for these ppl

Doesn't matter if enough complained about Daddy sim the same will happen.. i don't advocate abusing the rules to attack other groups but its what they did to house party just to be spiteful to other customers..

[Bee]

I'm pretty sure Dante is right--it's a flaw of the flagging system. The same thing happens with reddit, Facebook, and Twitter, and Youtube, and Patreon and such. A bunch of people get together and mass flag to trip the automated system. Then the only way whatever it is comes back is if there's massive user complaint. That's what happened here, I'm sure of it. A bunch of jerks flagged and then patted themselves on the back when it got taken down, but so many people complained to Valve that they had to take a personal interest.

Of course then it depends on the character of the company. Valve is fairly easy-going. Some of the others (Patreon, Twitter, etc.) have very definite political leanings and allow some stuff and not others according to their agenda.

[Buddy Dee's Ghost]

100% OP!

[FauxFurry]

I feel the same way, Bee.
I mostly want the amount of 'lewd' content to be greatly increased across the board in all media is to desensitize people to it.
It seems absurd to me that so many people find consensual sexuality to be so much more traumatizing than graphic non-consensual violence in this day and age.

[Evil_Befall]

there lot of people who think that dream daddy is a weird game it maybe popular but i think mostly for woman

[Bee]

Only Two Genders님이 먼저 게시:

Evil Befall님이 먼저 게시:

there lot of people who think that dream daddy is a weird game it maybe popular but i think mostly for woman

It is part of the agenda to push fetishes.

I don't think fetishes need pushing, or should be pushed. I'd go further, and say that pushing fetishes (cough Huffington Post slash Salon and their pedophilia acceptance campaign) turns people off.

What I'd like to see is a more general relaxing. I mean c'mon, everybody has fetishes, if you examine the word "fetish" and come to the obvious conclusion that it's simply something that somebody finds sexually appealing. And who gives a ♥♥♥♥, as long as they're not pressing on or hurting other people? A fetish is the same thing as a kink. It's a harmless thing, a preference, something that someone likes to look at or talk about that helps them get off. Who cares how somebody else gets off?

I'm for all the Dream Daddies and the gender-bent Dream Daddies and the House Parties and I hope Steam becomes more and more relaxed about sexual content, because it frees up game-makers to make better games. Sexual limitation is just that--a limitation. Frankly it's a weird blank spot to ask writers to write about things with the caveat: "Don't write anything sexual!"

I mean, average sexual activity is something like 1-4 times a week, for an American at least. It's a thing people do, like brushing their teeth or going to the bathroom. People jerk themselves off. It's not necessarily something people want to read about, but putting it in a 'DON'T WRITE THIS UNDER PENALTY OF LAW" box is just strange and needlessly prohibitive.

[Evil_Befall]

Bee님이 먼저 게시:

Only Two Genders님이 먼저 게시:

It is part of the agenda to push fetishes.

I don't think fetishes need pushing, or should be pushed. I'd go further, and say that pushing fetishes (cough Huffington Post slash Salon and their pedophilia acceptance campaign) turns people off.

What I'd like to see is a more general relaxing. I mean c'mon, everybody has fetishes, if you examine the word "fetish" and come to the obvious conclusion that it's simply something that somebody finds sexually appealing. And who gives a ♥♥♥♥, as long as they're not pressing on or hurting other people? A fetish is the same thing as a kink. It's a harmless thing, a preference, something that someone likes to look at or talk about that helps them get off. Who cares how somebody else gets off?

I'm for all the Dream Daddies and the gender-bent Dream Daddies and the House Parties and I hope Steam becomes more and more relaxed about sexual content, because it frees up game-makers to make better games. Sexual limitation is just that--a limitation. Frankly it's a weird blank spot to ask writers to write about things with the caveat: "Don't write anything sexual!"

I mean, average sexual activity is something like 1-4 times a week, for an American at least. It's a thing people do, like brushing their teeth or going to the bathroom. People jerk themselves off. It's not necessarily something people want to read about, but putting it in a 'DON'T WRITE THIS UNDER PENALTY OF LAW" box is just strange and needlessly prohibitive.

i watched a video about someone talking about hp removed from steam and he said it to its time for steam to allow games like this but i commented but the problem is and wil be making sure kids dont get acces to it

[Bee]

I have 4 kids, and I consider my kids my business, which is what all parents do. I am the person who decides what access they have to products and media. Nobody should expect a distribution company like Steam to handle what kids have access to.