You're only getting so far as your personal principles, your personal morals (which you have not bothered to explain) are the be-all end-all, and anything that does not conform to them is therefore "not principled," and "not moral." That's either robotic or childish. You can't seriously have grown to adulthood laboring under the assumption that your ethics, morals, principles, are some kind of universal truth, and that everyone else is in violation.

If you haven't encountered it before, I guess I'll pop that cherry: You are not necessarily correct. Going around lecturing the besieged that they're not playing fair is foolish. In a battle that will only end when the attackers cease or I'm dead, you're wagging your finger about universal fair play. It's primitive.

These questions aren't real questions. Nobody can answer: "What is your philosophy" in any kind of honest way in a forum and format such as this, that's completely ludicrous. Due to character constraints, if nothing else. Also, you don't actually seem good faith here, bro, gotta say. First you tried "That sounds womanish." Now you're onto "That sounds Islamic." I can't help but notice that you're reaching into a bag of identities that you probably think are anathema or to be avoided, based on your assumption of what you think "my philosophy" is. I see through it.

You are not trying to understand my position. I have explained it from about 18 different directions, and all you rejoinder is "That's immoral." That's not a good faith attempt at understanding, or even conversation.

"TLDR; taking resources from those whose goal is to destroy you and rape your children, is not immoral."

I'm honestly attempting to understand your position. It seems to me that you are saying that you align with the creed of the Islamist --- i.e. that you don't act upon principle, but rather you act upon Rules for Me and Rules for Thee? It's wrong to lie, cheat, and steal when it comes to a fellow Mohammedan, but when it comes to the infidel it's fair game?

By the way... I don't think it's out of the way for me to ask you: What is your philosophy?

TLDR; taking resources from those whose goal is to destroy you and rape your children, is not immoral.

It's suicidal, rigid, and devoid of nuance.

Of course, this whole thing has gotten unhelpfully metaphorical. Do you need specific case studies of getting burned by parasitic, corrosive, and piratical game publishers/sellers/developers, who've engaged in downright demonic behavior, in order for "I disagree with your moral framing of the nuances involved in this issue" to make sense, to you?

Subverting and sabotaging the corrosive destroyers outside your home to you is "womanish," and "doesn't make sense." WHEW OKAY, LAD. That's an...interesting, take.

My point here is that you have to have agreed-upon moral standards in order to have a zero-sum contest of morality with them. If they're simply ignoring your entire moral framework to, and I say this again, *destroy you, and your folk, and your children, and everything good in culture and society,* it is bizarre, and silly, to paint petty acts against them as "immoral." You'd have to stick to an inappropriately rigid set of robotic instructions, and completely ignore both ethics, and any attempt at practicality, to have that be your fallback position.