Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
With the Alchemy Workbench (2-slot), that makes 1,190 possible combinations.
With the Alchemy Workbench II (3-slot), that makes 39,270 possible combinations.
Total those to get 40,460 combinations.
Without the goop, trial and error would be entirely unreasonable for finding all valid alchemical recipes. With goop, it's a little easier because goop is a hint system.
Personally I couldn't be bothered. I collect games for the stories they tell and while I am not against a little grinding now and again (I survived EverQuest after all), this is nonsense.
I was bothered by this so I checked the wiki to see what I was missing, turns out I have both alchemy workbenches complete and have brewed every single recipe at least once, but, since I used 11 alchemy recipe scrolls, I don't have the master alchemist achievement (even if the achievement asks for 20 and I discovered 24 by myself).
Those recipe scrolls are from the DLC, they didn't exist before 1.20. Yes, LB made a mistake not accounting for that in the achievements, but consider this: It's not much of an "achievement" to have part of it handed to you, so it's legit to have to discover them all yourself, but there should have been a warning when using the scrolls that using even one would block the achievement, with buttons to choose whether to use the scroll or not.
Well, yes.
But I wouldn't say it's a flaw, it's more like a bug, if anything. I said, I used 11 scrolls that I got from the DLC, all other recipes I found myself, I admit I have looked to the wiki for a few, I think 6 or 7, but I've done them by myself, no scroll involved, so, in total, I have made 24 recipes BY MYSELF, which should count for the achievement, but since I don't have it... Well... You can make your own conclusion...
Well, yes, but actually no.
You see, there are 2 achievements, one asks for you to "discover" 5 alchemy recipes, the other asks for you to "discover" 20 alchemy recipes. Well, if "discover" means only making them yourself, and ONLY THAT, I should have the achievement, I did exactly what the achievement asks for, to "discover" 20 recipes (I have "discovered" 24), BUT, I don't have it. I admit I looked for some at the wiki, but no all, most I got from experimentation and 11 from scrolls.
In other words, I "achieved" what it was asking, even more than what was asked, but because I used some scrolls along the way, I'm denied my own "achievement".
I agree that is not much of an "achievement" if some are handed to you, but, for what is worth, out of 24 that I got myself, that is, without scrolls, 17 were pure grind, trial and error, and some of the ones I got from scrolls were so simple that I'd have gotten them eventually without much effort, still, no achievement for me.
This does look like a bug... Well, whatever, maybe someday I'll start a new file to get this 1 achievement...
It did, but it wouldn't make sense. The way the achievement is worded means, literally, that you have to discover 5, 10 and 20 recipes, not MORE recipes, but cumulative recipes.
If what you said is true, the achievement is missleading and should be rephrased to something on these lines: discover 5, 15 and all alchemy recipes.
Either way, it's now void and null, nothing to do about this. I won't start a new file soon, maybe in a year or so I'll come back to this, right now I'll, maybe, get the ones that are still possible and move on.
Making sense is subjective.
You do realize that this game is written by Russian folks, yes? It can be expected that the translations to English might not be 100% perfect and that such a nuance could be lost. Perhaps a post in the Suggestions forum would lead to a better achievement description. Or heck, I could be completely wrong and there needs to be a bugfix. What I posted was only one possible theory.