Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Just checked: totalwarlegend@gmail.com
That's my same thought, there was one, with cavalry, that was odd, think he ended up hitting his own cavalry with artillery?
Then in a later battle he Sallies out of Karakaraz with a strong army and manages to get most of his melee infantry slaughter via sloppy battle line planning. Got side hit by enemy cav too.
I didn't see his vids, but in those fights you mentioned did he win or lose?
Second one was a decisive victory but he lost a ton of troops to his own poor planning. He actually had an entire win of troops just standing on his right flank doing nothing for part of the battle. And he repeatedly sent dwarfwarriors forward to pursue skirmish cav.
But his plans for battle are awesome.
Wrong.
Well yes. It's called backseat gaming.
In this fictional universe you apparently live in, do you ever have opinions on things you aren't personally involved in?
You trashtalk people you probably never played against. Get off your trip dude.
I didn't trash talk anybody. Just answer the question.