Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
To be fair, the game isnt exactly new. And you ARE on a discussion thread ABOUT the not so new game...
But I will watch out for this going forward. Good point all the same mate.
Yeah its all the more infuriating because the rest of the game was the best Ubi has done in a long, long time. New combat. More fluid movement. More engaging characters. Solid lead voice actor....and the Hawk. Man the sheer amount of detail they put into that bird...from flying to landing on Bayek's arm during idle times...
And then, they go and rob all of it of any meaning at the end.
This is NOT how you get female leads to appeal to players. You do that by giving them a part in the whole tale, NOT having them steal the thunder at the end...(looking at Marvel here a moment, because while I am not saying it WILL go that way...it sure COULD do...).
I could not agree more mate... Origins has been a fantastic game. The size of the world the detail and the acting is incredible. However to me it ONLY an origin story, the birth of the Assassins, but not a true AC game. All the new elements are great and I hope it continues in future games, but I also hope they return to making "true" Assassin's Creed games. Also whilst I don't have the little mouse icon that says I have this game, I DO have ALL AC games released on PC but they are all thru Uplay, not steam... I just prefer these forums.
Thats another perspective on it: We actually spent the bulk of the game playing as the sidekick. Without the "hero" even being present.
Which, yes, is sort of dumb.
Regardless, I for one have had enough of Ubisoft's crap writing. I skipped Far Cry 5 because I already knew the story and its associated missions would be unforgivably obnoxious. So, no reason to keep Uplay around any longer...tiered of being let down.
I finished the main quest in Origins several hundred hours ago. The game is best as an exploration game. I have more fun watching an entire garrison die of poisoning then I did playing any of the quests (with the exception of Curse of the Pharaohs' main quest - that was Witcher 3 quality storytelling).
Ubisoft keeps making this same mistake every game: Give the player a ton of fun side activities with very few restrictions...and then force them to stop partaking of these and go play "story missions" constantly.
These story missions are almost universally worse than the side activities. More restrictive. More concerned with presenting set pieces than engaging game play.
Ubisoft needs to find the courage to drop "story missions" from their open world games. Just give us a big bad guy, a few main henchman and an underboss of two...and then drop us into the world and let us follow clues and make our way through to the big bad. May as well do this, as their story missions are universally bad compared to their side stuff.
Aya did not create the creed,,or the "Hidden Ones",,, Bayek did. It was ALL his idea, all she did was open a bureau in Memphis. Even as a result of what happened in 1st dlc, Bayek adds another "rule" to the creed that HE came up with...
whenever she and Bayek share scenes, all she does is lecture him while having to prove nothing of her ability herself. For all the things she lectured him about she couldnt prove that she would be doing it better. The feminist dream come true.