安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
:*( Please take a look at the results of that match ingame. The only player who didn't die once during that game was Robo which is level 129. He was 7-0 at the end of that game. If level is "completely unrelated to skill level" why wasn't anyone capable of taking out the highest level player in the game?
A lot of this is because of the same reasons for it in other games. Some people can play this game for years and still be (relatively) terrible at it. There's also the genre similarity aspect, such that someone being familiar with other moba's will be better than someone who has never played one.
However, Dota2 has the unique situation of being an almost identical clone of it's former. Even Call of duty's have different weapons/maps and they get a new one every year. What this does mean, is that someone, like myself, who played dota for years can jump into this game with only really an adjustment to the interface and be instantly better than most of the people at my level. Which tends to skew the perceived balance of the game. Of course then I have to deal with double treads snipers, but such is life.
It's like those who claim level 100 people in BF3 are not good. But if you tried a full team of 100 people and the other team with level 50 the 100 team would win.
But I've seen similar matchmaking disasters. Sometimes you just wonder if it would be that much to ask for to be teamed up with people on the same level or same level of wins.
1. Level =/= skill.
2. Kill/Death ratio =/= skill. All it says is if you played support or carry. I can go 10-0 if I like just by playing it safe all game and killstealing as zeus/invoker.
3. The matchmaker tries to force a 50% win rate on you. If you have been on a winning streak lately, it will put you in a team of clowns to force a loss on you to keep the 50%
That's not true. No winstreak is going to last indefinitely, nobody is forcing you to lose.
Buddy so you say junior football league has the same skill as champion fotball league? Since you seems to think time wasted in a game doesn't make you good at it. With very high level comes a lot of time invested.
The higher the level the more time you put in to the game, the more time you have in the game the more you know about the game. If there is one thing I seen in games is high ranked people are often in the top in the games I played.
Because all humans are learning at same speed.
It's mind boggling how wrong some people are about the mechanics and algorithm behind the matchmaking system
Again, battle level has 0 (ZERO) influence on matchmaking. neither do hero stats or performance bars. it's not considered. A level 10 player can be ranked higher than a level 100 player. The game doesn't force a 50%ratio. It will always try to match equal teams against each other. the game does NOT go "mhhh, he won 10 games in a row lets team him with many noobs vs a 5 man group". That's simply not how it works. Again, complaining about getting matched with player who have a lower battle-level is utterly pointless as it is in no way, shape or form an indicator of the players actual skill rating. The current matchmaking system can even detect smurfs and can easily match a level 5 with level 100+ if his match making rating/elo whatever you wanna call it is similar.