安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
the hero selection screen and library that seperate the heroes according to their so called 'faction'
umm were you sarcastoc about pudge?
Come on, he is deliberately avoiding murdering people, going out of his way to put himself in danger to satiate his craving without harming innocent people. He is one of the most morally pure characters in the game.
As for the selection screens - yes, they separate heroes, but there is no "radiant" or "dire" label on either side. It's separated for people who like to think that way, but if you aren't aware of the radiant/dire split, then there isn't one. I see nothing that definitely states the split as bering canon.
It doesn't make a difference who goes where, since they all seem to be doing it for thier own reasons, as to explain in many extracts of lore, all heroes have some kind of wish or goal. Some might just do it for kicks or just for a 'noble' cause. And the Radiant/Dire might be able to accommodate those wishes.
Simple, kill the other team, get a free wish (sounds a bit like dragon ball, excusing the reference)
yeah that's a very good explantion, i don't think there is no way to put it other than what you said, makes him much more likable.
and yeah, when you put it like that, the faction separtion is never actually brought up in the game, so it is really just for those who liked the "scourge/sentinel in dota1 from some reason.
It says in his backstory that he's sworn to destroy the "Dead God's magic users" and "to put an end to magic altogether". Nowhere does it say that he goes around murdering people for gits and shiggles.
Yeah, but you asserted that he was "good", not that he was neutral. He's apparently such a terrifying sight that even the other undead fear him (Even those who are beyond fearing the Reaper, fear the Butcher.)
It seems odd to me that you are willing to excuse the guy who likes to chow down on fresh bodyparts as "just the way they made him" while condemning the character who's on a crusade to avenge a bunch of pacifistic monks.
I agree that both sides contain examples of characters who are probably best described as "neutral", which is why the original game (I think) actually had a 3rd neutral faction. But for the characters that ARE good or evil, there is a definite bias in which way the various moralities tend to swing.
Which is why I said before that it's not really good vs. evil, so much as left vs. right- two factions in opposition. And some characters ended up on one side or the other just because that was the less-worse option, or they've allied themselves with whoever advances "the greater good", or even just their personal vendetta best. It's really not that big a deal, I think, if you are willing to see it as a more complex setting with shades of grey, instead of just black and white.
their lore is really nothing alike, riki's is based far more on being ignored being the middle child in a family which let him essentially become invisible
while lycan's is a ruler attempting to punish a noble for believing in "heresy" basically
yes they both have the same catalyst (family murdered) but there are only so many sets of lore
(really enigma/invoker are probably more similar based on two magic beings that are essentially immortal, one who made himself immortal/one who is questionably "god")
or slark/slardar their lore is basically two sides of the same coin (one the escaped prisoner, one the guard)
Enigma is a god now, apparently
I'm not sure but that sounds pretty godly in my opinion