Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
Blizzard is trash, they haven't made anything good since BC.
Warcraft 4 will never come out, if it does it will be ♥♥♥♥
:(
frankly I think valve made a very good and true version of Dota 1. And the most importantly to keep the game free. We the players choose if we want to continue to spend money on the game. I say kudos to valve.
I can't disagree more. Diablo 3 was... just... crap. There's no defending it. Blizzard is a good developer, but they have their mistakes just as anyone else does.
Valve did a fine job at Dota 2 if you ask me. And it shows, so many people play. They've gotten way more attention then the original (which still kicked ass.)
Besides, Blizzard had lots of time to recruit Icefrog and Dota, but never did. They have their reasons, and I'm pretty confident they don't regret anything. They still make a ton of money.
#Worththeweight
#GabeN
Please keep unicorn pony for yourself, blizzard
You do know HoTS is stupidly early alpha?
It si pretty unfair to compare it to a finished game like dota.
As if you cant judge the concept of the game by the alpha and the interviews they have given.
The concepts of the game are placeholders, the only perople who own the game are reviewers, press and friends and family, they even admitted that most features would be changed or removed like the horses
And that makes it immune to judgement and comparison?
No matter how "placeholders" the concepts of the game are,someone at Blizzard thought it a good idea,even if for a minute.
The mounts are going away?Excellent.You know why?Because people disliked it.
Doesnt make it that Blizzard didnt want the mounts to be part of the game.
No, it does make it immune to judgement but what im saying is that it shouldn't be what most people are doing which is looking at it and going "LAWL S*IT GAME INNIT? XD". After comparign ti will a game that has years of post development behind it. And at least Blizzard are actually making it rather than Valve buying it because all they see is money.