Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
but i guess it's safe to assume except if someone is REALLY good with the lowes WR heroes, it's better to avoid picking them too much as they aren't for a reason.
sometime it's not even that they are bad by themself, but just that they don't fit the current meta.
Some time it's the illusion / macro heroes, sometime the evading ones, or the tanky ones...
As an exemple, Taking a brood and relying on his spiderlings for exemple, on a meta where a LOT of ppl do either maelstrom or cleave on carry is just gonna feed enemy for no reason explaining (at least partially) his desastrous winrate.
Yet you have some exceptions, like phantom assassin.
It's an easy to counter hero, with a bad winrate, yet it's one of the most played accoding to dotabuff (15% of games in current meta) . Why? because like some other, invisibles heroes, for example, it's extremly efficient on low ranks. PPL don't know to use break, or do mkb (or reveal for invis heroes). So they seem powerfull (while thei're not)
it does not actually matter what that statistics says, it meant almost close to nothing to you and your friend personally.