Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem
AMD GPU + Vulkan is the more cost effective choice when playing low spec Source games like DOTA 2, compared to Nvidia GPU + DirectX
But entry-level gaming GPUs from both Nvidia or AMD will run Dota 2 fine.
AMD OpenGL driver is very slow. Vulkan only works fine for AMD because it were created for GCN architeture.
Only API which showed a big difference in performance there was OpenGL which probably dont matter for Windows users, other API's showed small differences.
That mean than with OpenGL for AMD you need to buy faster/expensive CPU's to get better FPS while with a NVIDIA GPU you can save money with CPU.
For the guy whining about GTX770 against AMD card, 390 is about 50% faster than GTX770 for triple AAA GPU-bound games which is not the case of Dota 2. Dota 2 cant even squeeze all power from GTX770 at 720p, if you pay attention for information of GPU and clock usage of GTX770 while playing you gonna see it was using 30% of the GPU. Yet R9 390 loose to GTX770 at 720p with a 2 core CPU in OpenGL API and in others it was almost same since CPU limited both cards.
My system hardwares :
Cpu: Intel pentium dual core E5300 2.60 ghz
Gpu :amd 5830 hd
Ram 4 gig
Plz help I don't have money for buy a new pc