Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
And (abandonment aside), every match has 5 players win and 5 players lose.
If you have an insanely high or low winrate then your games aren't evenly skilled. Which would mean the matchmaking is bad.
In other words most players having a winrate of around 50% indicates that the matchmaking is working perfectly fine.
This being said most players in the link you posted have above 54% winrate a few of them even got above 60%. Why are you disproving yourself?
5-6 games won't change much to your % if you've already thousands of game played.
btw s4 and nothingtosay is sitting at almost 61% winrate in more than 6k matches. ana at 65% winrate in 7.5k matches.
Focus on yourself to get better. If you keep blaming others or system, you will never move up.
Forced 50% is a theory of noobs who choose to blame the system instead of understanding that they belong in that bracket. Not a single pro ever said that forced 50% is real.
Skill based matchmaking leads to ~50% outcome. That's all there is to it.
If the matchmaking was pure random low skilled players would have atrocious winrates and very skilled player would have unbelievably high winrates.
The facts are that the average winrate of guardian players and ancient players is roughly the same. 50% because most players are in their skill bracket.