Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Fact: Several professional players also have smurf accounts. (You also know who they are.)
Fact: To date it seems that players who aren't content creators and have smurf accounts are the ones who are being banned.
Question: Why are these content creators allowed to continue having smurf accounts? Or better yet why has Valve continued to allow these players to ruin the game for legitimate players?
Wrong measures or wrong perception.
Smurfing is an inherent feature that keeps players with the game beyond their level-out. Real measures would have such an impact on the game that they don‘t go that way. Neither the developers nor the players want such changes.
Fact : TI winner / streamer (content creator) like aui 2000 or mason have their smurf account banned already.
Question : what pvp multiplayer online game as big as dota that doesn't have smurf in their game ? Last time i check league still have smurf, Even valorant have smurf. Are those gaming company allow those players to ruin game for legitimate players ?? because if they do that means Valve is just the same like all others gaming company.
Thats exactly my point. Do you expect valve can suddenly doing massive ban in just one year since the rules applied when other game have many years to solve and still not solveable.