Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
A lot of „apparent“ cases have an in-game or even before game history (mutual aversion) that makes it hard to identify a single culprit. In addition the game is maybe already a lost cause long before the incident kicks in. Killing a dead horse is not high crime.
These restrictions and the limited patience of lay judges qualify Overwatch as a drumhead court-martial and not more.
most cases i received were people being reported from the very start of the game which makes no sense.. literally 5 mins from start when nothing happens.
i'm guessing they get reported for their picks or something which is not a reportable offense.
its not griefing, certainly not feeding and if its cheating its hard to tell from the fountain.
2nd most reported case were just people blatantly deleting their items and going afk..
its just gets so depressing to watch as a reviewer...
1. You have any1 who is with good behavior and probably Archon rank to watch and decide, not taking in fact that there are plenty of boosted ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ or acc buying ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ who have that option = FAIL
2. When reviewing, HOW ARE YOU SURE they actually reviewed and which rules do they follow ? Do they see the whole game ? the just reported part , how do they know the whole story... I see BSJ doing Judgements usually and I am satisfied by his decisions 85% of the time, with them 15% cus his brain works at Immortal and not lowbie ranks.
3. What is the point of a System where there is no ONLINE support nor way to Appeal in a conviction? NOR TO KNOW EXACTLY WHERE< WHEN AND HOW WERE YOU REPORTED ...
All in All .. system which MAY have been good.. its just plain Retarded . In overall .. hats off the exceptions :)
Some countries are just so snobby, draconian abusively nasty to it's citizens and allow the bureaucracies/telecoms over influence.... cause they think they have a future in politics.
Plus they get pissed over angry gamers, so they hold grudges overly opinionated angry comments and think it's a hate crime, when really they are just overrated angry abuse parent jack***.