Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Link to this match with a Guardian and an Ancient.
That is probably a herald guy playing with a lot of high mmr players and then when calibrated they got high rank. But when playing solo theyre trash. Idk its just what I thinj it is. :D
Hahaha maybe, but im still curios on the criteria used by the ranked roles matchmaking :P
well in solo queue most of the time i play with peps of my same medal, wich is ok, but when i play in team, damn things go crazy, you see one guy so low and another guy way up in mmr, its kinda crazy to see that xD
So your team consisted of a Legend 4, Legend 3, Archon 3 (you) Archon 2 and Crusader 1.
The other team consisted of an Ancient 2, Legend 3, two Archon 4s and a Guardian 1.
So the overall difference between your two teams in MMR/rank spread is barely negligible.
Ohhh so it´s a math equation after all... i was kinda confused to see a 700 and 4k mmr players on the same team, thats why i had that doubt of the mmr gap.
There's a limit in MMR spread for ranked parties but there were multiple parties in both of your teams.
Great, ty for the answer, this clears the doubt.