Інсталювати Steam
увійти
|
мова
简体中文 (спрощена китайська)
繁體中文 (традиційна китайська)
日本語 (японська)
한국어 (корейська)
ไทย (тайська)
Български (болгарська)
Čeština (чеська)
Dansk (данська)
Deutsch (німецька)
English (англійська)
Español - España (іспанська — Іспанія)
Español - Latinoamérica (іспанська — Латинська Америка)
Ελληνικά (грецька)
Français (французька)
Italiano (італійська)
Bahasa Indonesia (індонезійська)
Magyar (угорська)
Nederlands (нідерландська)
Norsk (норвезька)
Polski (польська)
Português (португальська — Португалія)
Português - Brasil (португальська — Бразилія)
Română (румунська)
Русский (російська)
Suomi (фінська)
Svenska (шведська)
Türkçe (турецька)
Tiếng Việt (в’єтнамська)
Повідомити про проблему з перекладом
Think of the matchmaking system like a grid.
^
|
| Behavior Score
|
<--------------------------->
| MMR
|
|
^
The X-axis being your MMR, and the Y-axis as your behavior score. You get matched with players that are closest to your personal X, Y coordinates. So say if my behavior score is maxed out (let's say 1000), and my MMR is 2.5k, I will be matched with other players that are within the region of (2500, 1000). Likewise, if I have an MMR of 5000 and a BS of 0, I'll be matched with other people in that area.
Long story short, every range of MMR in the game has good and bad ends of matchmaking, all depending on your behavior score. Easiest way to raise behavior score is to be polite to your teammates, accept constructive criticism, and be generous with your commends so you can get them in return.
EDIT: Steam's ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ up my grid formatting, but I think you get the idea.
What I mean to say is that there are a whole lot of people who simply maintain a "normal" behaviour score or don't play freqently enough to move down that I am probably now playing with.
Whatever the case, if you're seeing these sorts of people frequently, that means your own score is probably fairly poor, and you should examine yourself to see if there's anything you should improve on.
I doubt that, the other team and other 3 team mates are usually very nice and cooperative - so I think it's just a failed / flawed system.
I'm probably quitting Dota for good after seeing what I calibrate at next rank reset.
i ' bumped' the ' Gordon Ramsey announcer pack post' .. just a head ups
I've heard similar things as well, was hoping to get more opinions tho.
Meh, it's just a game and I have many of them; I really should just quit, just a long history with the game keeping me here I guess :/
Before, during and after I had Normal behaviour score - but everyone on my team was saying they we were all in low behaviour score game. I also had someone on my team I have muted/blocked as I used to have him in F behaviour score; so this confirms what they said.
Why (when I have normal behaviour score) am I constantly getting these people in my games??
Is there a hidden score above Normal?? I get very few reprots usually <3 and 20-30 commends.
What the actual F_ _ _ ?
Also for not checking runes and continue farming the lane 1 minute after they spawn.
Maybe not only for that, but it should add to a "gold feed score" and when it reaches 10-20% of team's worth, it might be worth considering.
But even better than reporting these players is, making them have to pay a fee of 20% of their income to other team members until 200 gold is paid.
The system should show these players why they need to pay.
Also, when you die to 2 enemies which were visible for some time around you and your team goes back, leaving you alone.
This should not apply when the enemies have >70% net worth of all allies around.
Also, gold shouldn't fully repay you for your death loss, only 60% at most but 40% at least.
Otherwise trolls have too much room to abuse this system.
penalty feature "xyz": want, maybe, avoid.
Then, dota2 would at start of matches look at features 2+ player want and enable then unless 1/2 amount of players avoid them.