Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
So of course high mmr player should have high winrates even if they can't go up anymore.
I only have one account and my winrate has never been below 56% since I started looking at it.
Once I reached 60% playing ranked, but sadly I dropped back to 56%. For the amount of game I've played this mean a lot of mmr to be lost, but I lost none because I saw it coming :P.
Technically impossible. They would need to do it turn by turn because by that logic, more than one player would be due for a mass feed and if they put a feeder on both team it doesn't work...
Also, matchmaking doesn't decide of the performance of an individual. It cannot go beyond statistics and Humans are not made to be consistent.
for players in a bracket who stay there over an extended period of time their winrate goes to 50 percent as well, outside of the top and bottom of, say, one percent of the entire player base
Right now I am 3k mmr and I have 56% winrate. Even if I played another thousand ranked game and remaned at 3k mmr, it is impossible that my winrate flattens to 50%. At the very limit, it I hadn't already had played a lot of games I could fall down to 51%, but right now I would need to play an impossible numbers of game to get to 51% winrate and still be 3k mmr.
Players who have winrates in the long run that are significantly different from 50% are mis-ranked, either to high (below 50% and with falling MMR) or to low (above 50% and with rising MMR). Everyone is slowly moving towards a point where they will achieve a long-term winrate of about 50%.
If everyone had a 50% winrate, everyone would have the same mmr.
Let's think it very simple. If everyday everyone would get the same amount of wins and loss, their mmr would never change.
In such a perfect world, you would be attributed your perect mmr at your very first game and it would never change because as it's perfect you'd have a 50% winrate.
if his winrate is more then 55% (not counting party and normal matchs)then its 1 of 2
1 his a smurf/boosters
2 he improved else where (another account or in normal matches or he got good tips)
It doesn't work like this. You can't climb in mmr if you have a 50% winrate and your winrate doesn't drop instantly to 50% once you've reach your peak. If you are a high skill player, even if you reached your peak mmr, it is very unlikely that your winrate will drop to 50%.
I'm am near to having played 2k games and I am 3.4kmmr with a 56% mmr. There was a time where I only played mmr and I reached 60% winrate. this for 4% drop means more than a 100 mmr, but I saw it coming and went back to normal.