Actual Balance?

[Brian_Tabor]

Since you clearly have no intent to balance cards. Have you thought, in any way shape or form. Of just balancing the decks?

It's easy. Or easier. Just give each card a value. Let's say 1-100 or 1-1000. Then you just add the total value of the deck and match people against other people with similarly valued decks. And you could set up what the norms, or caps would be. After you value the cards for low mid and high play and set numbers for the deck based on this. Then people could just build decks based on these caps and play a game that isn't horribly balanced.

You know?

Not my idea really. Whether you like it or not. It's in Forza Horizon. Cars can be modded and are given a score based on the projected performance. And then cars are matched in racing based on this number. which is also displayed as S2, S1, A, B, C, and D.

I have a motto. Don't try and solve the problem, look for someone who already has. And use their idea. Hope you use it though. I might keep playing it into the future if you do.

[Brian_Tabor]

And if that is somehow too hard to do. Just have fixed deck matches. And if you don't do one of these you are clearly just greedy incompetent a-holes. Which wouldn't be surprising. But just cause mommy and daddy didn't raise you right isn't a free pass to be freaks. So fix your game.

[Brian_Tabor]

I hope people remember this post when they are paying for their 80th deck. And realize they could but never will balance this game until the money dries up from the mouth breathers pumping money into it.

Seeing how broken it is now. I know it's not an accident. They will never implement balance there are too many dumbass people spending money. And even though in the long run it'd keep the game alive longer. And make equal or more money. I can see these people feed into the brokenness to get people to spend cash. And are greedy sharks. Who are too lazy, greedy, and incompetent to do what is needed to make this a functioning game.

And I'd bet the money they wish I'd spend on this game. That they know ways to balance the game already and just aren't doing them too maximize income. But will when interest starts to die. You do not get this level of broken without someone actively trying to break it.

[Void]

Game is filled with people whose only Game is this, stop even trying to discuss with anyone lol, it will lead to exactly nowhere. Leave the nerds alone to themselves

[TasteDasRainbow]

He's not trying to discuss with anyone, he's trying to vent his frustration, hence the lack of rationale and the presence of ad hominem's, much like you do yourself.

Right now with the transition period especially is the most generous 1939 has been thus far, which is saying a lot.

There are a couple oppressive decks that need and will be addressed, but it's far from being the cataclysm described.

[Brian_Tabor]

Originally posted by TasteDasRainbow:

He's not trying to discuss with anyone, he's trying to vent his frustration, hence the lack of rationale and the presence of ad hominem's, much like you do yourself.

Right now with the transition period especially is the most generous 1939 has been thus far, which is saying a lot.

There are a couple oppressive decks that need and will be addressed, but it's far from being the cataclysm described.

Well there is a clear difference in tone simply because they were written from different perspectives

The first and seconded are easy to implement ideas that would actually balance the game. And give people a playing experience that is enjoyable.

The third is the compete realization that they will never do that. Are greedy, evil, self interested people. Who have been feeding on, and exploiting, their player base to milk them for all they are worth. bBy pushing a broken system. And making people pay to play a balanced aka the draft system.

Crack dealers give people their first hit for free. There is nothing generous about it. It is an investment. Cold and calculated. Frustration, yes. Everyone is a greedy nasty worm now. People like that are running everything their hand touches. It does get frustrating.

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/ad-hominem
Well let's see. If peoples actions can in no way describe or infer their motives, then yes it is. That clearly not being the case, as any judge or lawyer can tell you. Then no, it is not. And the only argument for it being such an attack, would be for them to plead total ignorance, to any knowledge, or abilities, to surmise or come to a better alternative.

But the only way that would be actionable now. Would be for them to actively implement the idea which I have suggested. Which they won't. Thus proving that I am right. And my assertions about their character, are correct. And provable by their inaction.

Put it this way. You see a man drowning which you don't like. You could run for help but it's hard, there might be no one around you, have no phone. Inaction might make no difference. You have excuses. But someone pulls up in a car. Sees the drowning man and pulls out his phone, and says, I'll call for help. And then the first man grabs the phone out of his hand and throws it in the water.

There is no excuse left. The intent is to continue the situation to the end that he has determined to see. And he has taken, an action. To avoid, a change in the outcome.

If they implement it. I was completely wrong. And will truly apologize as being wrong. But if they don't. It completely proves my notions about their character.

Oh and I sent a ticket as well. Which they just, so, happened. To receive last night. I got the confirmation and everything.