Why everyone is palying Aggro deck???

[404NotFound]

what is the fun for that? finish a game in turn 4 or get a board wipe and lose, it just so Utilitarian, if you want be efficient to climb ladder, okay , but why play a boring,no interactive aggro deck at marshal? That is so cheap.

[jzak]

Ladder has always focused on playing the most optimal deck possible - mostly playing quick (aggro) decks.

The recent ladder/achievement changes (together with the recent card release) has highlighted this even more - playing as many games as possible.

[Sudhir]

Originally posted by jzak:

Ladder has always focused on playing the most optimal deck possible - mostly playing quick (aggro) decks.

The recent ladder/achievement changes (together with the recent card release) has highlighted this even more - playing as many games as possible.

This is the answer. Kards has always been set up to favour aggro as the "optimal" deck. I doubt that will ever change.

[DARKCA5TLE]

Aggro isn't played much at all in tournaments.and high level play.

[terrynationgl]

Originally posted by 404NotFound:

what is the fun for that? finish a game in turn 4 or get a board wipe and lose, it just so Utilitarian, if you want be efficient to climb ladder, okay , but why play a boring,no interactive aggro deck at marshal? That is so cheap.

Perhaps your opponent is only playing to get a quick win to gain the '2 gold for first win of the day' ? Aggro is the fastest way to get one win if you're already FM so don't need to rise on the ladder any more this month.

[Odium]

Originally posted by DARKCA5TLE:

Aggro isn't played much at all in tournaments.and high level play.

That is because you usually know who is playing what and can tech to it.

On ladder cause it is random of course aggro can smash ya.

[Odium]

Aggro is important in all card games.

It has to be strong to punish super greedy decks.

[thebigmacdaddy]

I rather enjoy playing aggro, I'm not as good at it as others but my worst aggro deck will still turn the lights out against ill constructed ramps and discards. That Soviet artillery deck with Supply Chain is the real mutha fukkar. Discard and aggro don't have crap on it. Maybe I should update and rebuild my old Soviet Artillery deck with some of the combos I've been seeing lately. Regardless, this game is basically paper, rock, scissors. So if you keep playing rock, then you're gonna find the paper. Try posting something with less tears and more content. You can beat aggro without aggro but you probably won't because your too busy complaining about why someone would play this style. You already know the answer, so why would you ask?

[General E. Drunk]

Originally posted by terrynationgl:

Perhaps your opponent is only playing to get a quick win to gain the '2 gold for first win of the day' ? Aggro is the fastest way to get one win if you're already FM so don't need to rise on the ladder any more this month.

I literally just did that 5 minutes ago :D No time to play today, but managed to squeeze in two fast games while I was brushing my teeth.

[JavaXCrow]

Originally posted by 404NotFound:

what is the fun for that? finish a game in turn 4 or get a board wipe and lose, it just so Utilitarian, if you want be efficient to climb ladder, okay , but why play a boring,no interactive aggro deck at marshal? That is so cheap.

Because all the Reserch decks are so effing annoying and even less fun, best way to beat them is with aggro.

[404NotFound]

Originally posted by gaboignacio:

Why does everyone on these forums criticize other players choices? Discard? cheap, aggro? cheap, artllery decks? cheap, counteroffensive? cheap.

I bet there is a lot of people that think your deck is boring and cheap too. May as well start your thread with a [salt] tag to clarify and avoid.

whatever you say, there is a fact that the Fast decks(japan-garmen aggro/ discard/ British air/artillery) is take too much percentage at ladder, any health card game should balance it, Compare to Magic the gathering, there is 1 or 2 mana removal spell like lighting bolt/ path to exile/ helix/ and lot...lot..... this game to deal 3 damage to creature(with no limit)will be at least 3 mana and a removal spell will be at least 4 or 5,But the creatures in MTG is about same size to this game, 1 mana 2/1 2/2 and 2 mana 2/3 3/2. the slow response to the aggro decks is something to change, need more low mana spell(with less or no limit).

[Void]

Because it takes less skill and you just spam cheap units that often are just Standard (high chance of always having them reliably)

[General E. Drunk]

Originally posted by 404NotFound:

Fast decks(japan-garmen aggro/ discard/ British air/artillery) is take too much percentage at ladder

> fast decks
> discard

Choose one. Only one.

[Heresy]

You are basically just not a smart person if you are new and dont use an aggro deck. Its much faster gold income and progression for new players.


The only people that seem to hate aggro decks are the guys who dropped hundreds of dollars and are using their meta copy/pasted deck off some website. Then cry when a rogue agro deck wins. Its pathetic really.

[Lost Latios]

Eh, I dislike aggro. I'd much prefer a good back and forth game. Aggro is literally quickly wipe the floor with your opponent or get smashed when it doesn't work. Ends up (for me at least) boring to play on both sides of the coin.

[Heresy]

I dont understand how aggro can be more boring than all you booboos playing guard decks, tolken decks, discard decks, resistance blah blah all that meta copy/paste crap where you are literally stealing other peoples meta deck builds.

Then yall get rekt by rogue custom decks and ♥♥♥♥♥ because " you should be winning" according to some artificual win rate given to said copy and pasted deck at some superficial rank that actually means ♥♥♥♥ all when you climb the ladder.

No slow decks are boring, Discard is boring and slow, gimmick decks like autocannon are just troll and not even that strong. Medium decks are even boring.

Aggro means ur playing at least twice as many games in the same time as any other deck leading to more gold and or faster climb in rank. The people who dropped $500 and cry cause their meta "win decks" are losing are boring and its always the same tune.

Aggro is an essential part of the game that would make for alot of extremely dull long boring as ♥♥♥♥ matches if it didnt exist. Its also something for f2p players to actually compete with.