When 1.0 version ?

[Taijin]

title.

[CrankyOldMan]

They do not give eta's!

[Jolie Rouge]

Hmmm, hard to see the future, always in motion it is. Patience you must have, young one.

[eighthwonderbeeton8]

I heard it's early summer.
But I heard that 1.0v is not a finished product and will probably continue to be developed in Early Access.

The source of the story is an online article.

[Gavener]

.095 - 095.1 - 095.2 etc

[The Key of Diary]

Originally posted by Gavener:

.095 - 095.1 - 095.2 etc

0.95.1.1, 0.95.1.2, 0.95.1.3, ... 0.99.9.9.9

[Deathwhisper]

Hello :),

There is no ETA Aviable. We just recently arrived at 0.95v.

[PepsiMontana]

Xmas 2024 i guess :P No stress.

[Andi]

Originally posted by eighthwonderbeeton8:

I heard it's early summer.
But I heard that 1.0v is not a finished product and will probably continue to be developed in Early Access.

The source of the story is an online article.

Can you maybe provide a link to said source? That would be interesting, since I suppose many expect 1.0 to be the end of ea phase for this game. Hmm, if that's correct 1.0 wouldn't be the kind of milestone I expected. It would change a lot regarding the development of scum and the understanding of such for, I suppose, most people following the game.
It's clear 1.0 isn't the end of all things and surely (hopefully) they'll continue to work on it though, but still.

[eighthwonderbeeton8]

Originally posted by Andi:

Originally posted by eighthwonderbeeton8:

I heard it's early summer.
But I heard that 1.0v is not a finished product and will probably continue to be developed in Early Access.

The source of the story is an online article.

Can you maybe provide a link to said source? That would be interesting, since I suppose many expect 1.0 to be the end of ea phase for this game. Hmm, if that's correct 1.0 wouldn't be the kind of milestone I expected. It would change a lot regarding the development of scum and the understanding of such for, I suppose, most people following the game.
It's clear 1.0 isn't the end of all things and surely (hopefully) they'll continue to work on it though, but still.

In the meantime, I will post a link to an article that says SCUM 1.0v will be around early summer.

The article about not knowing if 1.0 will be the production version was in Japanese, but I can't find it.
I am looking for it now.

https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/xbox/xbox-release-for-open-world-zombie-survival-game-scum-has-been-confirmed

[Andi]

Originally posted by eighthwonderbeeton8:

Originally posted by Andi:

Can you maybe provide a link to said source? That would be interesting, since I suppose many expect 1.0 to be the end of ea phase for this game. Hmm, if that's correct 1.0 wouldn't be the kind of milestone I expected. It would change a lot regarding the development of scum and the understanding of such for, I suppose, most people following the game.
It's clear 1.0 isn't the end of all things and surely (hopefully) they'll continue to work on it though, but still.

In the meantime, I will post a link to an article that says SCUM 1.0v will be around early summer.

The article about not knowing if 1.0 will be the production version was in Japanese, but I can't find it.
I am looking for it now.

https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/xbox/xbox-release-for-open-world-zombie-survival-game-scum-has-been-confirmed

Thanks.
Actually, I don't see a 1.0 release mid summer or even earlier. I can't imagine the game passing Microsoft quality control for a release on Xbox in it's current state and I also don't think much will be added, fixed and finished within just a few months. But we'll see.
Japanese isn't an issue anymore these days. ;)

[eighthwonderbeeton8]

I believe there have been several Japanese articles saying that they are not sure if 1.0v will be the production version. For now, I will post one link.

There was an article around November last year that said the XBOX version would be released at the same time as the 1.0v release, and at this point the 1.0v would be the production version.
The article in December of last year or January of this year was toned down to say that they were not sure if 1.0v would be the production version.

https://www.gamespark.jp/article/2024/01/07/137308.html

I would like to state my opinion.
I don't care if 1.0v is not the production version.
The 1.0 number is a guide.
Whether the version is 0.95, 1.0, or 1.5, each version does not change my enjoyment of SCUM.

[eighthwonderbeeton8]

Originally posted by Andi:

Thanks.
Actually, I don't see a 1.0 release mid summer or even earlier. I can't imagine the game passing Microsoft quality control for a release on Xbox in it's current state and I also don't think much will be added, fixed and finished within just a few months. But we'll see.
Japanese isn't an issue anymore these days. ;)

Valheim has released an XBOX version in the Early Access phase.
The same is true for Palworld.
It is very likely that SCUM will release the XBOX version in Early Access as well.

[Andi]

Originally posted by eighthwonderbeeton8:

Originally posted by Andi:

Thanks.
Actually, I don't see a 1.0 release mid summer or even earlier. I can't imagine the game passing Microsoft quality control for a release on Xbox in it's current state and I also don't think much will be added, fixed and finished within just a few months. But we'll see.
Japanese isn't an issue anymore these days. ;)

Valheim has released an XBOX version in the Early Access phase.
The same is true for Palworld.
It is very likely that SCUM will release the XBOX version in Early Access as well.

It's not about ea. I know well that games in ea release on consoles as well. ;)
I'm talking a pass through Microsoft quality control.
In case you're not aware, Microsoft and also Sony require games to fufil a certain quality standard.

[Nebz]

The real question is, will 1.0 represent a complete experience, without major changes to mechanics or the addition of essential components that should've been included pre-1.0?

[BubblestationCPH]

I could see this game go into same state as 7dtd; a longarse alpha period, to the point where people will start to ask for release NOW, or some start to call em scammers.
But really.
As long as they continue to work on the project, as long as theres a high frequency of meaningfull updates that each bring something to the table, then its all good.
With this in mind

Originally posted by Nebz:

The real question is, will 1.0 represent a complete experience, without major changes to mechanics or the addition of essential components that should've been included pre-1.0?

and a peep at how much content RUST have had added after launch, then I absolutely dont care what devs call their game from pre-alpha to "platinum edition" with all DLCs included.
>At this point in time, then its just names.
And its near impossible to tell where a game ends its actual dev-time..