TROLL

[DiDDLERONTHEROOF]

any significent changes to the core gameplay besides dramatic loss in players?

[DiDDLERONTHEROOF]

its only 6000 people ahead of dayz if you wanna know how horrible the active player base is, just as a comparison as they are arguably the 2 most popular/notorious survival games out

[I Taste Colors]

Originally posted by irokash brtsh:

its only 6000 people ahead of dayz if you wanna know how horrible the active player base is, just as a comparison as they are arguably the 2 most popular/notorious survival games out

People who use playerbase on a bare bones EA game that has been out for a month as an argument for how the game is doing really shows how little they know about EA games.

[Erogath]

Originally posted by I Taste Colors:

Originally posted by irokash brtsh:

its only 6000 people ahead of dayz if you wanna know how horrible the active player base is, just as a comparison as they are arguably the 2 most popular/notorious survival games out

People who use playerbase on a bare bones EA game that has been out for a month as an argument for how the game is doing really shows how little they know about EA games.

This. It's an early access game that's been out 1 month. Surely people didn't think that the game would spike up to (however many) concurrent players and stay there forever? I'm certain as content is added you will see waxing and waning of active players. That isn't the only measure of a game's success, rather 1 very small part.

[DiDDLERONTHEROOF]

Originally posted by I Taste Colors:

Originally posted by irokash brtsh:

its only 6000 people ahead of dayz if you wanna know how horrible the active player base is, just as a comparison as they are arguably the 2 most popular/notorious survival games out

People who use playerbase on a bare bones EA game that has been out for a month as an argument for how the game is doing really shows how little they know about EA games.

coming from a guy whose name is i taste colors, cheers mate

[DiDDLERONTHEROOF]

Originally posted by Erogath:

Originally posted by I Taste Colors:

People who use playerbase on a bare bones EA game that has been out for a month as an argument for how the game is doing really shows how little they know about EA games.

This. It's an early access game that's been out 1 month. Surely people didn't think that the game would spike up to (however many) concurrent players and stay there forever? I'm certain as content is added you will see waxing and waning of active players. That isn't the only measure of a game's success, rather 1 very small part.

wasnt asking for opinions on how much i know or dont know about EA games, or whether its good or not, was asking if theres any significant changes besides the player base. that is all

[Erogath]

I never said anything about EA games. And your question was unanswerable as the playerbase has nothing to do with core gameplay so I attempted to respond as best I could.

If you're strictly asking about gameplay, as of right now. No, there hasn't been any major core gameplay updates just a few additions. Read the patch notes?

[SUwUMaBUwU]

Nothing major has been added, but that isn't a problem for me. This game doesn't even feel EA. Sure, there's a few issue with buggy gear making you overweight and some sickness' being uncureable, but the game runs so smoothly it's unreal. Not everyone buys the game to hammer it. I mean, they will play it from time to time as a lot of people are interested in it, but people buy it to support the Dev's and also grab it while it's cheap. I hated DayZ. Yes, this is similar, but it's already past the standards of where DayZ was went it start. Miscreated was my survival game to beat, but now it's SCUM.

[DiDDLERONTHEROOF]

okay then not necassarily core gameplay, and yeah i did i had just figured by now that they had done something besides add a deagle

[DiDDLERONTHEROOF]

Originally posted by RedCoats SudzMaballz:

Nothing major has been added, but that isn't a problem for me. This game doesn't even feel EA. Sure, there's a few issue with buggy gear making you overweight and some sickness' being uncureable, but the game runs so smoothly it's unreal. Not everyone buys the game to hammer it. I mean, they will play it from time to time as a lot of people are interested in it, but people buy it to support the Dev's and also grab it while it's cheap. I hated DayZ. Yes, this is similar, but it's already past the standards of where DayZ was went it start. Miscreated was my survival game to beat, but now it's SCUM.

compared to scums crazy unrealistic visible system of all calories vitamins etc, as for running smoothly i get 30 frames in this with low settings and rarely do i get that in a game, its not a secret that it has a performance problem so just because it runs smoothly for you doesnt mean the game itself runs smoothly

[SUwUMaBUwU]

[/quote]
compared to scums crazy unrealistic visible system of all calories vitamins etc, as for running smoothly i get 30 frames in this with low settings and rarely do i get that in a game, its not a secret that it has a performance problem so just because it runs smoothly for you doesnt mean the game itself runs smoothly [/quote]

When was the last time you stood behind a wall or had your face towards a tree and was able to see around or over it? That's pretty realistic to me. You shouldn't be able to see anyone if your characters eyes can't physically see in front of them.

I like the depth of vits and other things you need to keep an eye on. Vits aren't that hard really and you just eat what's in front of you. Fills up pretty quickly. I'd be more worried when different weather comes in to play and the sun really comes out. Being fully geared will be an issue then.

It all adds to the game. Not all games should be made for babies and new comers.

I'm literally running an i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz, 12 GB RAM and a 10603GB and I get a smooth 60 on max until memory leak.

You can't have a worse computer than me.

Maybe, I'm just lucky and if it runs poorly for you, then I hope they optimize it to suit your system.

[Valmorgan]

Originally posted by I Taste Colors:

Originally posted by irokash brtsh:

its only 6000 people ahead of dayz if you wanna know how horrible the active player base is, just as a comparison as they are arguably the 2 most popular/notorious survival games out

People who use playerbase on a bare bones EA game that has been out for a month as an argument for how the game is doing really shows how little they know about EA games.

^ Truth.

[Dregor]

Hey boys we all know that comparing the concurrent players of a game thats less than a month old is the same as a game thats two years old... because they're both EA so its the same right? Right? Everyone knows this.

[DiDDLERONTHEROOF]

Originally posted by RedCoats SudzMaballz:

compared to scums crazy unrealistic visible system of all calories vitamins etc, as for running smoothly i get 30 frames in this with low settings and rarely do i get that in a game, its not a secret that it has a performance problem so just because it runs smoothly for you doesnt mean the game itself runs smoothly [/quote]

When was the last time you stood behind a wall or had your face towards a tree and was able to see around or over it? That's pretty realistic to me. You shouldn't be able to see anyone if your characters eyes can't physically see in front of them.

I like the depth of vits and other things you need to keep an eye on. Vits aren't that hard really and you just eat what's in front of you. Fills up pretty quickly. I'd be more worried when different weather comes in to play and the sun really comes out. Being fully geared will be an issue then.

It all adds to the game. Not all games should be made for babies and new comers.

I'm literally running an i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz, 12 GB RAM and a 10603GB and I get a smooth 60 on max until memory leak.

You can't have a worse computer than me.

Maybe, I'm just lucky and if it runs poorly for you, then I hope they optimize it to suit your system. [/quote]
ever heard of first person only servers? cuz i havent. and did anyone ever realize that were all playing the same exact game and unless your cheating nobody has the advantage besides experience/luck. as for the vits im not worried about it at all, its easy and its a joke its literally no different than any other drinking eating system in a game besides you can get fat and strong and it directly affects skills like sniping. its a gimming and a joke, somebody flag this post lol i cant talk to people who only play a game cause you have tons of numbers and can defecate on each other

[DiDDLERONTHEROOF]

Originally posted by RedCoats SudzMaballz:

compared to scums crazy unrealistic visible system of all calories vitamins etc, as for running smoothly i get 30 frames in this with low settings and rarely do i get that in a game, its not a secret that it has a performance problem so just because it runs smoothly for you doesnt mean the game itself runs smoothly [/quote]

When was the last time you stood behind a wall or had your face towards a tree and was able to see around or over it? That's pretty realistic to me. You shouldn't be able to see anyone if your characters eyes can't physically see in front of them.

I like the depth of vits and other things you need to keep an eye on. Vits aren't that hard really and you just eat what's in front of you. Fills up pretty quickly. I'd be more worried when different weather comes in to play and the sun really comes out. Being fully geared will be an issue then.

It all adds to the game. Not all games should be made for babies and new comers.

I'm literally running an i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz, 12 GB RAM and a 10603GB and I get a smooth 60 on max until memory leak.

You can't have a worse computer than me.

Maybe, I'm just lucky and if it runs poorly for you, then I hope they optimize it to suit your system. [/quote]
i5 3.1 8gb and 1050 ti 4gb, its nothing fancy but i shouldnt have to have a rig over 600$ to play a 20$ game

[DiDDLERONTHEROOF]

Originally posted by Dies Fourth:

Originally posted by irokash brtsh:

any significent changes to the core gameplay besides dramatic loss in players?

Originally posted by irokash brtsh:

its only 6000 people ahead of dayz if you wanna know how horrible the active player base is, just as a comparison as they are arguably the 2 most popular/notorious survival games out

Wow.............. the passive agressive comments, reminds me of my 14 year old niece lol

Amanda is that you ?

bro youve been in so many posts its got to be up in the hundreds, i remember people like you in school, we called them teachers pets