Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I'm all for better optimizations but unless a Dev comes on here and says otherwise I wouldn't hold my breath at this point.
such toasters are slowing down the technical progress, even though it sounds rude.
As others said they've made strides. This game really likes powerful GPUs and decent CPUs. My kids PCs can play it...one has an i3-4160, 8GB DDR3, and a GTX 770 2GB, the other is identical except has a GTX 1050 2GB. Both handle 1080 with medium-high settings. Mechanical hard drives mean looking load times but once in the game its pretty damn smooth.
So if I take a look at your system gpu: 850m what I would call a low end gpu for what it can do today (dedicates gpu)... Sry to say it but if you bought that for gaming you did a mistake... I7 well you just comfirmed you are not tech savy, my guess you have no idea what even i7 means. When you want to post specs next time get the cpu name, i7 is not a cpu it's just means 4 or more cores which is hyperthreaded....
Your cpu is good enough, most likly would guess a 4700hq... Your gpu is just bad, it's simply bad... Well your gpu is well bellow the 660....
Also you have clearly no idea what you talk about ashes is last time I checked the most scaleble game in the world thx to nitrus... No onther game can scale well with any amount of cores as long as it's 4 (mabye 2 cores, but not the best experience) or more which today is mainstream.... and well if they demanded less well screw every that actaually have a mainstream pc... That means well a lot more limts in the game to amke sure bad pcs can run it
Bliss stop complaning about nonsense.....
Not every1 has a decent pc, I get that but don't drag every1 with you down by stopping development of good games by limiting them so an intel hd grapichs can run it -_-
Man, I don't know how you got that, his intital post couldn't have been more gently put frankly.
That's a good point. Well , Starcraft II is what I call a very well optimized game. I can play with good details and never experience any lag even with a medium/low budget gpu like my 850m . Yes , I know starcraft is not comparable to ashes in terms of units/things happening at the same time , but what I dont understand in Ashes is that even at the very beginning of the game , it is already very "laggy" , probably because my gpu is at the minimum requirements. I'll start looking for a 1060 gpu notebook in order to play the game properly , I'm not refunding cause i want to support the devs. Have a good evening to everyone