Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Failry close to it, IMO the devs should stop doing any more DLC for this game and start doing a WW2 game that can handle vast maps and thousands of units.
Oh I hope not that would be very sad indeed.
The game is doing fine. The player base isn't the largest out there but it is slowly growing.
Well that's good news but I hope they invest all the profit into a new game with the same games engine instead of just bringing out new map DLC which I'm not too bothered about.
WW2 games are more about micro-management than macro-management,
because, like it or not, that war was not won by a huge single blob of soldiers zerging the enemy.
Ok, what about medieval times?
All us Ashes players are constantly trying to promote the game mate.
No 'Is this game dead' posts pls