Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
I just dropped the view distance from very high to high and turned PhysX back up to medium and now it runs great, even holds 60fps @ 4K now with only minor dips in places, the view distance was what was hammering performance for me.
yeah same here, I am on High view distance as well. if you haven't tried tweaking the physx stuff yet, feel free to try my settings above. I'm also running game through DVXK, and additional changes to "[MemoryBudgets]" values.
I would not necessarily call the 9700F an overkill part being a single threaded processor.
Believe it or not some games not only take advantage of multithreading, some games cannot run well without it...
BL2 is one of those titles...
I would not peg this as your only issue , however it seems likely to be the main culprit...
Also to note, I had the FTW3 1080ti with an 8700k I could achieve around 120-125 fps on ultra settings when I first got the game...
Chipset can also affect performance...
No it is not, imfamously even so.
So you got a way weaker system..........
I have an old PC here, Ryzen 5 1500x, Radeon 580 gamer X, 16gb generic ram, X370 chipset
Game runs flawless, way higher than 30 to 50fps
I also have a much newer desktop
Ryzen 5 5600x, Radeon 6750 XT, 32gb of fast ram, x570 chipset.
Game would far outstrip v-sync if i let it, into the realm of stupidly useless frames.
My friend? game ran like arse on his 4070 system, he said the game was crap.
I took an old HDD, put it in his system, did a clean OS and driver install, game ran like a bat out of hell.
He still refuses to wipe and reload his OS.
You can only lead the horse to water
Congratulation - you played yourself.
I think he meant' the 9700F is single threaded as in for each of it's cores, it might have 8 cores but is single threaded for each of them, I don't agree with Casurin in the regard to the 9700F not using multi-threading being the cause of the performance issues though, the OP has confirmed the issues were fixed by installing installing DXVK.
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Core+i7-9700F+%40+3.00GHz&id=3465
However both CPU's are almost equal in performance (at least for games that require 6 cores), the i7 8700k has higher clock rates and the 9700F has two extra cores, the 9700F uses less power so it has that in it's favour.
A more detailed look:
https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-9700F-vs-Intel-Core-i7-8700K/m816132vs3937
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Core+i7-9700F+%40+3.00GHz&id=3465
However both CPU's are almost equal in performance (at least for games that require 6 cores), the i7 8700k has higher clock rates and the 9700F has two extra cores, the 9700F uses less power so it has that in it's favour.
Sorry you are correct the 9700F is indeed single threaded for each of it's cores.
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Core+i7-9700F+%40+3.00GHz&id=3465
LMAO that was rich , guy came in here confidently incorrect , tried to act like he was "just trying to help" called the people who corrected him "entitled ass" and "noob" while running away pretending he was still right.
The best part is if they had just read the thread they would have seen the solution was already found , they embarrassed themselves for no purpose.
Gave me a good chuckle.