Borderlands 2

Borderlands 2

Vezi statistici:
Is Handsome Jack American?
Yes or no?
< >
Se afișează 61-75 din 76 comentarii
Postat inițial de Cute Sandwich™:
Postat inițial de Starbug:
Sounds like someone has a gamer crush on handsome Jack. Gouging out people's eyes with spoons is such an endearing quirk.

but girls find him hot so they won't mind
Being hot and funny are Jacks only redeemable qualities.
Editat ultima dată de Hemmis; 15 mai 2020 la 8:23
Nakos 17 mai 2020 la 0:22 
Postat inițial de Casurin:
Postat inițial de Nakos:
In BL:TPS Jack very specifically explains how he plans to use the Eye of Helios (the giant laser that Zarpedon is using to destroy Elpis) to scour entire bandit camps from Pandora with a single shot. (That's WHY Moxxi, Lilith and Roland destroy it. Because it's a Weapon of Mass Destruction, and they don't trust anyone with it).

Postat inițial de Nakos:
Anthony Burch (et al), the people who worked on Tales and the people who worked on BL3 are three completely different groups of writers. Stitching together the creative works of three different groups and insisting that it's a consistent canon is laughable.

Yep - laughable is your glaring double-standard - now decide - is BL:TPS and BL3 canon or not?
In both casey you have no actual argument so it is kinda irrelevant. But just to drive home the point: Jack wanted to use that superweapon to destroy bandit-camps - it is in the name - those are BANDITS - they are the group of people running around and killing everything they can, even their own group if they are bored.

Apparently, you're unaware that Anthony Burch was the lead writer for BOTH BL2 and BL:TPS. There's more direct consistency between those two titles than any of the other Borderlands games. But yes, I do decide what I think is sufficiently internally consistent to consider canon or not. That's a choice I'm making for myself, you're free to make a different choice. But that's not relevant to the issue at hand. Whatever happens in BL3 isn't relevant to the internal logic of BL2 vs BL:TPS, nor to this moral debate we've gotten off into.

Yes, Jack wanted to destroy the "Bandit camps".

But just because Jack decides to refer to something as a "bandit camp" does not mean that's what it actually is. As the old expression goes: Saying it doesn't make is so. Jack called New Haven a "Bandit Camp". Jack calls Sanctuary a "Bandit Camp". Those were both population centers of the innocent civilian populace, being administered by the formal civilian authority (as represented by Helena Pierce). But because they didn't fall in line and obey Hyperion's directives, Jack decided to destroy them.

And you've already admitted you're aware there were actually innocent civilians on Pandora.

Jack thinks everything on Pandora that he didn't personally build is a "bandit camp" That's kinda the point of the entire section of the story.

Yes, some of the "bandit camps" were actually filled with actual bandits. But we've already discussed that and you've dodged or avoided any attempts to rebut what I, Hemmis and Starbug (et al) have already pointed out: You don't know enough to dismiss them out of hand. None of them started out as bandits, and regardless of where they ended up, Dahl still bears a responsibility towards them.

Nothing they personally did absolves Dahl of moral responsibility.

Lots of people on Pandora use the term "bandit camp", not all of them mean the same thing by it, despite using the same word. That's one of those funny things about language.

Maybe you've played the mission Written by the Victor? That's kinda the whole point of that too. Jack cheerfully rewrites the entire history of BL1, retconning himself into the story.

https://borderlands.fandom.com/wiki/Written_by_the_Victor


Postat inițial de Casurin:
And Moxxi and co with their actions threatened not just the total destruction of the space-station and all the people on that as well as elpis and Pandora too.

What the heck are you talking about? Moxxi, Lilith and Roland figured that the STATION would be destroyed. At that point in the story, Helios Station was full of Jack, his personal "Vault Hunters", and Dahl forces. None of those are people whom Moxxi, Lilith and Roland felt were unacceptable losses.

Were there innocents (scientists, workers, etc) on Helios Station at the time? Yes, probably. Moxxi, Lilith, and Roland considered those acceptable losses provided the Weapon of Mass Destruction was eliminated. Yes, that's a brutal decision. I didn't personally make it, but if you want to get off into a debate about the morality of that we can.

However, neither Pandora nor Elpis were threatened by that decision. That was the point of their action. They were taking a powerful piece off the board (the WMD) so that no one (Jack or Zarpedon) could use it. They did that in order to protect the civilians on both Pandora and Elpis. For Moxxi, Lilith, and Roland, they were choosing to (potentially) sacrifice a handful of civilians in order to destroy Jack (a megalomanic with a WMD), Zarpedon (a fanatic cultist, who, ironicially throught she was doing exactly the same thing they were doing: Killing a small number to save a much larger number).

Pandora and Elpis were threatened by the existance of the Eye of Helios, not by its destruction.


Postat inițial de Casurin:
Postat inițial de Nakos:
<several Handsome Jack quotes taken directly from BL2>
Yes, so jack says he wants to kill the people that backstabbed him and tried murdering him, as well as wipping on ther bandits that are also just running around and murdering everybody.......

AND all the innocents running around on Pandora, remember them? You've already admitted they exist. In fact, you just did it again. If the Bandits are "running around and murdering everybody" then that "everybody" is someone you have to consider. Jack was going to kill "everybody" too.

And again: No matter what the bandits were doing: Dahl still abandoned them.


Postat inițial de Casurin:
Postat inițial de Nakos:
And here's the issue you tried to dodge (yet again): If you're going to claim that the bandits on Pandora are attacking/murdering/sexually assaulting innocents then you're implicitly admitting that you're aware that there are actually innocent civilians on Pandora.

2 things there - first that is yet again a strawmen cause that is not what i said - they attack EVERYBODY. And yes there are innocent people on pandora - like the people workint in normal hyperion facilities - the only civilised places we see in all of pandora.

You still don't understand what the term "straw man" means. I said you implicitly admitted there were innocents on Pandora. And right now, you've just explicitly admitted that you're aware that there are innocents on Pandora. If you're going to say that everyone on Pandora except the Hyperion employees were "bandits" then you're doing exactly what Jack was doing.

Pandora was filled with civilians who were there as ordinary workers who weren't convicts. Pandora was filled with ordinary people who's only crime was being born there.


Postat inițial de Casurin:
Postat inițial de Nakos:
The issue is that you don't actually know what crimes any of those people were charged with. We know they were "criminals", but Starbug's point is that Dahl had complete authority to decided what constituted a "crime" and the "crimes" those convicts committed may or may not have been things we the players would actually consider "crimes".
And now another blatant lie - it really shows that even you know you have no actual argument, you just want to have mroe murderes runnign around while claiming that the only person in BL2 that tries to stop them is at fault.

<sighs>

Nope, not a lie. You really do have zero idea what any of those so-called convicts were actually charged with. No one has every told you what they actually did. Feel free to provide an actual link to a Gearbox Developer telling us what crimes they actually committed. Oh, you can't? Quelle surprise.

I don't want more murderers running around. THAT actually is a straw man argument.

The point is that Handsome Jack isn't some maligned innocent who only wanted to make things better. He's a narcissistic megalomaniac who cares only for himself, who kills anyone and everyone who gets in his way. Who lies, cheats, steals, murders, blackmails, enslaves, and attempts (at least twice) to commit genocide. And that's who you're trying to defend.
Editat ultima dată de Nakos; 17 mai 2020 la 0:23
Postat inițial de Nakos:
Jack called New Haven a "Bandit Camp". Jack calls Sanctuary a "Bandit Camp"..
They both ARE bandit-camps....
Postat inițial de Nakos:
Those were both population centers of the innocent civilian populace,
And here we have it again - you claiming that bandits are all innocent.

Postat inițial de Nakos:
And you've already admitted you're aware there were actually innocent civilians on Pandora.
Yes, the very few people that are not bandits - the people that YOU claim are in the wrong and are justified to be killed.

Postat inițial de Nakos:
None of those are people whom Moxxi, Lilith and Roland felt were unacceptable losses.
Yeah, just kill a few thousand people, most of which are just construction-workers and staff - not insane at all.


And the rest of your insane rambling - please get help.
Postat inițial de Casurin:
Postat inițial de Nakos:
Jack called New Haven a "Bandit Camp". Jack calls Sanctuary a "Bandit Camp"..
They both ARE bandit-camps....
Following this logic, then in BL1, according to you, there where nothing but bandits and Atlas on Pandora, that could be true if you actually use the definition of bandit to mean "a gang of people not abiding by the law or residing in a lawless place" but it sound like you think it means "murder and rapist" when it doesn't. Like with the Dahl convicts being "criminals", "bandit" doesn't mean anything specific.

But again following your and Jacks logic, all the bandits are violent offenders who murder anyone they come in contact with, so Hyperion sent civilians there knowing full well that they where sending them right down to a planet where the only populace was bandits. That only make Hyperion look even worse and more careless about the human lives they claim to protect.

Postat inițial de Casurin:
Postat inițial de Nakos:
Those were both population centers of the innocent civilian populace,
And here we have it again - you claiming that bandits are all innocent.

We have brought it up many times before, but not all of the people Dahl brought to Pandora were convicts, Tannis and her team being an exsample, those people were also left behind and never commited any crimes, those are the people living in New Haven at the time of BL1.

Saying that the people in New Haven (or Sanctuary, Hollow Point and Overlook as other examples) are mostly innocent civilians is not the same as saying all bandits are innocent, that's another strawman.

Soot 17 mai 2020 la 5:54 
america doesn't exist in borderlands so no, the voice actor is from canada
Nakos 17 mai 2020 la 6:51 
Postat inițial de Casurin:
Postat inițial de Nakos:
Jack called New Haven a "Bandit Camp". Jack calls Sanctuary a "Bandit Camp"..
They both ARE bandit-camps....

No, they're not.

New Haven was created by the refugees from Old Haven (who were chased out by bandits). See, that inherently proves that there are both innocent civilians AND Bandits on Pandora. Those civilians had nothing at all to do with Hyperion, and were mostly people who came to Pandora either to work directly for Dahl and/or Atlas, or to work indirectly for them, by providing goods and services to those Dahl and/or Atlas did bring to Pandora. And (again) there are also people (like Scooter and Ellie) who were BORN on Pandora.

Sanctuary was built on top of a Dahl corporation mining vessel. The people inside are the largest group of civilian survivors left (at the time of BL2 at any rate). Have you ever talked to any of them? None of them were convicts.

Postat inițial de Casurin:
Postat inițial de Nakos:
Those were both population centers of the innocent civilian populace,
And here we have it again - you claiming that bandits are all innocent.

First of all, as I pointed out above, the people in New Haven and the people in Sanctuary were NOT bandits.

Second, that's you, attempting to make a "Straw Man" arguement. I never said the bandits were innocent. Ever.

What I said was that the Bandits were victims of crimes by Dahl. As baffling as it apparently is to you, I am neither claiming that the bandits were innocent, nor am I claiming that they were guilty. I'm pointing out that we do not know what crimes they committed (prior to being sent to Pandora as convict (slave) labor). But, regardless of what crimes they may, or may not have committed, Dahl DID commit a crime by abandoning them and turning them loose on the civilian population.

Postat inițial de Casurin:
Postat inițial de Nakos:
And you've already admitted you're aware there were actually innocent civilians on Pandora.
Yes, the very few people that are not bandits...

Yeah, see? There you go, admitting that you're aware that there are innocents on Pandora. Good, excellent, we're making progress. The actual numbers are irrelevant for the purposes of the moral debate, but they're a lot more of them than you think there are. (Or at least there WERE a lot more of them than you think there were, prior to the convicts being turned loose).

Postat inițial de Casurin:
...the people that YOU claim are in the wrong and are justified to be killed.

Nope, that's another Straw Man. I never said any such thing. The innocents deserve to be protected. That's what the Crimson Raiders are doing. Protecting them (from Hyperion and from the bandits). That's what the Vault Hunter (the player character) also does, joins the Crimson Raiders and helps protect the innocent.

Postat inițial de Casurin:
Postat inițial de Nakos:
None of those are people whom Moxxi, Lilith and Roland felt were unacceptable losses.
Yeah, just kill a few thousand people, most of which are just construction-workers and staff - not insane at all.

Helios was populated by: Jack, Jack's "Vault Hunters" (Who really were Vault Hunters, but whom Lilith later insisted were NOT Vault Hunters, see, there's that whole concept of the same word meaning different things to different people again), and the "insane Dahl military forces".

So we've got Jack, who's a narcissistic megalomaniac with a WMD, Jack's "Vault Hunters" who are aiding and abetting him, and thus are also morally responsible for his actions, and the Dahl Lost Legion who were planning on blowing up Elpis (destroying all life on Elpis, which in turn probably would have destroyed all life on Pandora as well). And yes, there were probably some Hyperion Civilians left as well, but how many there were is unknown (and honestly, they were Hyperion employees, Hyperion wasn't a very nice company, a case could be made that any Hyperion employee has a certain amount of moral "taint").

So, yes, Moxxi, Lilith and Roland weighed all of those lives against the lives of those on Elpis and Pandora and decided it was an acceptable cost. (Again, ironically, Zarpedon was doing the same thing at one metal-level higher, by weighing the lives of those on Elpis and Pandora against the impact of the rest of the universe if the Vault was openned).

And finally, I'm not defending that choice, I'm just explaining it.

Postat inițial de Casurin:
And the rest of your insane rambling - please get help.

Mmm, yeah, tell you what, how about you go take an Ethics course, and maybe one on Logic.
Editat ultima dată de Nakos; 17 mai 2020 la 6:54
Nakos 17 mai 2020 la 6:52 
Postat inițial de Hemmis:
We have brought it up many times before, but not all of the people Dahl brought to Pandora were convicts, Tannis and her team being an exsample, those people were also left behind and never commited any crimes, those are the people living in New Haven at the time of BL1.

Plus the ones who were actually just born there. They may have been "ignorant rednecks" but they weren't criminals.
Postat inițial de Hemmis:
Saying that the people in New Haven (or Sanctuary, Hollow Point and Overlook as other examples) are mostly innocent civilians is not the same as saying all bandits are innocent, that's another strawman.
Both are bandit camp - so no, saying they are mostly innocent is directly making the claim that bandits are innocent.

But you have shown that you just want to ignore what the games actually tell us directly.
there is no point in you constantly lying.

Postat inițial de Nakos:
Sanctuary was built on top of a Dahl corporation mining vessel. The people inside are the largest group of civilian survivors left (at the time of BL2 at any rate). Have you ever talked to any of them? None of them were convicts.
None? So nobody of the crimson raiders - the combination of old atlas soldiers and BANDITS by rolands own words - is a bandit? How insane are you?
Heck , we even get told that the crimson raiders are going to the bandits with a "Join us or we kill you" proposal.

Postat inițial de Nakos:
First of all, as I pointed out above, the people in New Haven and the people in Sanctuary were NOT bandits.
You CLAIMED that despite what the game and the devs show and tell us.


Postat inițial de Nakos:
Yeah, see? There you go, admitting that you're aware that there are innocents on Pandora. Good, excellent, we're making progress. The actual numbers are irrelevant for the purposes of the moral debate, but they're a lot more of them than you think there are. (Or at least there WERE a lot more of them than you think there were, prior to the convicts being turned loose).
And you are still claiming that Jack wants to kill his own employees and the very few innocent people that the crimsonraiders are constantly killing....


Postat inițial de Nakos:
Nope, that's another Straw Man. I never said any such thing. The innocents deserve to be protected.
UHm... that was a direct reply to your claims - and you are still saying to protect the BANDITS which are - and there is no arguing the fact - murderers at best.

Postat inițial de Nakos:
Helios was populated by: Jack, Jack's "Vault Hunters" (Who really were Vault Hunters, but whom Lilith later insisted were NOT Vault Hunters, see, there's that whole concept of the same word meaning different things to different people again), and the "insane Dahl military forces".
Nice lie you got there.
Postat inițial de Casurin:
Postat inițial de Hemmis:
Saying that the people in New Haven (or Sanctuary, Hollow Point and Overlook as other examples) are mostly innocent civilians is not the same as saying all bandits are innocent, that's another strawman.
Both are bandit camp - so no, saying they are mostly innocent is directly making the claim that bandits are innocent.

But you have shown that you just want to ignore what the games actually tell us directly.
there is no point in you constantly lying.
You are completely ignoring the definition of "bandit" that I just gave you. Bandit and criminal aren't synonymous with "murderer"
What in your mind does bandit and criminal mean?

You just ignoring half of what we say doesn't make your argument any stronger, on the contrary.

And you still haven't provided a single quote to back anything you say up, if the game tells us directly, it should be easy to find.
Casurin 17 mai 2020 la 10:25 
Postat inițial de Hemmis:
You are completely ignoring the definition of "bandit" that I just gave you. Bandit and criminal aren't synonymous with "murderer"
What in your mind does bandit and criminal mean?
It is you that is trying to change the meaning constantly, even going to the insane claim of bandits being innocent.

Postat inițial de Hemmis:
And you still haven't provided a single quote to back anything you say up, if the game tells us directly, it should be easy to find.
Funny how that applies to you, with the slight difference that you even contradict your self constantly.
Starbug 17 mai 2020 la 10:25 
Postat inițial de Hemmis:
Postat inițial de Casurin:
Both are bandit camp - so no, saying they are mostly innocent is directly making the claim that bandits are innocent.

But you have shown that you just want to ignore what the games actually tell us directly.
there is no point in you constantly lying.
You are completely ignoring the definition of "bandit" that I just gave you. Bandit and criminal aren't synonymous with "murderer"
What in your mind does bandit and criminal mean?

You just ignoring half of what we say doesn't make your argument any stronger, on the contrary.

And you still haven't provided a single quote to back anything you say up, if the game tells us directly, it should be easy to find.

Yep. He's committed deeply to the contrarian troll role.
Nakos 17 mai 2020 la 10:54 
Postat inițial de Casurin:
Postat inițial de Hemmis:
Saying that the people in New Haven (or Sanctuary, Hollow Point and Overlook as other examples) are mostly innocent civilians is not the same as saying all bandits are innocent, that's another strawman.
Both are bandit camp - so no, saying they are mostly innocent is directly making the claim that bandits are innocent.

But you have shown that you just want to ignore what the games actually tell us directly.
there is no point in you constantly lying.

No, they're not. They're civilian cities.

Jack calls them "bandit" camps.

Jack isn't the authority, he doesn't get to decide who's a bandit and who isn't.

Postat inițial de Casurin:
Postat inițial de Nakos:
Sanctuary was built on top of a Dahl corporation mining vessel. The people inside are the largest group of civilian survivors left (at the time of BL2 at any rate). Have you ever talked to any of them? None of them were convicts.
None? So nobody of the crimson raiders - the combination of old atlas soldiers and BANDITS by rolands own words - is a bandit? How insane are you?
Heck , we even get told that the crimson raiders are going to the bandits with a "Join us or we kill you" proposal.

First of all, don't think I didn't notice you clip out the part about Old Haven being a civilian city, and the residents of New Haven being refugees from that.

The inhabitants of Old Haven established New Haven in the wake of increasing bandit incursions on their former home. It has been said that New Haven's continued survival is in part due to the steady supply of refuse being dropped in the area, providing ample materials from which to build.

https://borderlands.fandom.com/wiki/New_Haven

Second of all, No, Roland did NOT say that the Crimson Raiders were Bandits. He said the former Lancemen had a choice: Join the Raiders, OR become bandits. He recruited them.

Postat inițial de Roland:
This is a message to any Crimson Lance left on Pandora. General Knoxx is dead, and knowing the Lance, they're more likely to cut their losses and leave you here than send an extraction ship. So unless you wanna starve to death out there, you've got two options. One: you become bandits. Two: you join me in protecting the people of Sanctuary. I can offer you food, shelter, and the chance to fight for something real, something meaningful -- a chance I know the Atlas corporation never gave you. Roland, out. Lancemen -- attention! I have only one question to ask of you all. One question. Just a few years ago, we were enemies. But that time has passed. As glad as I am to see you all in Sanctuary, I know you wouldn’t have come if you had any other option. I know how bad things are out there. I know how Jack’s army has swept across this planet like a sandstorm, ripping apart everything in its way. When I joined the Crimson Lance years ago, they told me I’d be fighting to protect those who couldn’t protect themselves. But you all know as well as I do -- that was a lie. But this fight, against Hyperion? It isn’t. If we don’t band together -- if we can’t protect this city from Jack’s army -- then we’re done for. I am Roland, and I only have one question to ask: ARE YOU WITH ME?!

All of Roland's remarks from BL2 can be found here: https://orcz.com/Borderlands_2:_Roland_Quotes

Go ahead and look for the line you think is there. You're not going to find it.



Postat inițial de Casurin:
Postat inițial de Nakos:
First of all, as I pointed out above, the people in New Haven and the people in Sanctuary were NOT bandits.
You CLAIMED that despite what the game and the devs show and tell us.

The game doesn't tell us that it tells us just the opposite. (See Roland's quote, above). Jack calls Sanctuary a "bandit camp", once again, Jack isn't the authority, he doesn't get to decide who's a bandit. He labels people "bandits" to dehumanize them and trivialize his brutal genocidal rampage across Pandora.

Second, if you've GOT a dev quote, then link it, otherwise you're making it up.



Postat inițial de Casurin:
Postat inițial de Nakos:
Yeah, see? There you go, admitting that you're aware that there are innocents on Pandora. Good, excellent, we're making progress. The actual numbers are irrelevant for the purposes of the moral debate, but they're a lot more of them than you think there are. (Or at least there WERE a lot more of them than you think there were, prior to the convicts being turned loose).
And you are still claiming that Jack wants to kill his own employees and the very few innocent people that the crimsonraiders are constantly killing....

Postat inițial de Moorin:
Uhm, sir? we've lost at least a dozen staff to the Angel's malfunctions. We need to shut her down! Your wife suggested as much before her disappear--
Postat inițial de Handsome Jack:
Jimmy, please make a note: I'm strangling Mister Moorin for bringing up my wife.
Postat inițial de Blake:
Choked... Mister Moorin...
Postat inițial de Handsome Jack:
No, no, Jimmy, choking is something you do when you eat too fast. As I'm crushing Mister Moorin's windpipe with my watch chain, what I'm doing is actually referred to as strangling.

Postat inițial de Handsome Jack:
I can’t say for sure, Keith, but I’m loathe to take advice on children from someone who doesn’t have any.
Postat inițial de Keith:
I have kids sir, two boys.
Postat inițial de Handsome Jack:
That's the thing – you don't. Not anymore.

Postat inițial de Handsome Jack:
Work faster or I'll kill you.
Postat inițial de Handsome Jack:
Did you know littering in Opportunity is punishable by death? If not, you also oughtta know complaining about Opportunity's laws is considered verbal littering.

There's also the bit where he flushes three Hyperion scientists out of the airlock, but it's long so I won't quote it. You can find it here though: https://borderlands.fandom.com/wiki/Science_and_Violence/Transcript




Postat inițial de Casurin:
Postat inițial de Nakos:
Nope, that's another Straw Man. I never said any such thing. The innocents deserve to be protected.
UHm... that was a direct reply to your claims - and you are still saying to protect the BANDITS which are - and there is no arguing the fact - murderers at best.

Jack calls them "bandits", that doesn't actually make them bandits. And I've refutted your claim about the Crimson Raiders being bandits twice now (this time I linked the actual Roland quote).

You're wrong, the people of Sanctuary aren't bandits.

Postat inițial de Casurin:
Postat inițial de Nakos:
Helios was populated by: Jack, Jack's "Vault Hunters" (Who really were Vault Hunters, but whom Lilith later insisted were NOT Vault Hunters, see, there's that whole concept of the same word meaning different things to different people again), and the "insane Dahl military forces".
Nice lie you got there.

Really? That's the best you've got?

At the time Moxxi, Lilith and Roland blew up the Eye of Helios, Helios Station had the following on it:

Jack.
Jack's Vault Hunters: Athena, Wilhelm, Nisha, Claptrap (and Timothy, and Aurelia).
The Dahl Lost Legion (whom Claptrap referrs to as "insane Dahl military forces").
It's unclear how many Hyperion employees were onboard at the time. There were probably some, but it wasn't like the station was finished, so it wouldn't have had a full population.

But that's not the point. The point is that Moxxi, Lilith and Roland made a moral choice. They decided that the trade off in lives was worth it to destroy the Eye of Helios, save Elpis (and the people of Pandora), whom Jack specifically states he intendes to scour off the face of the planet.

Postat inițial de Handsome Jack:
Once we get this baby back under our control, it could wipe out entire bandit encampments with ZERO friendly casualties. Sounds pretty great, right?
Postat inițial de Lilith:
<worried> Yeah. Sounds great.
Editat ultima dată de Nakos; 17 mai 2020 la 10:59
Casurin 17 mai 2020 la 11:08 
Funny how you are still defending murderers and keep making ♥♥♥♥ up.
ZZZZZ 17 mai 2020 la 11:19 
funny how both didnt read the whole borderlands story and still argue
Editat ultima dată de ZZZZZ; 17 mai 2020 la 11:19
Nakos 17 mai 2020 la 16:22 
Postat inițial de Casurin:
Funny how you are still defending murderers and keep making ♥♥♥♥ up.

Funny how you have absolutely nothing to back up your claims, and yet I can produce reams of quotes taken from the game to back up mine.

Funny how the best rebuttal you can manage is a weak straw man about me defending people.
People whom you're incapable of proving are guilty of anything, and whom the game deliberately differentiates from the actual "bandits" you fight.

Go ahead, pull some quotes, find me that dev link you keep insisting you know of.



Postat inițial de The_Unknown_05:
funny how both didnt read the whole borderlands story and still argue

Hey, I'm not claiming my memory is perfect, if you think I got something wrong, feel free to point it out. But I'm going to ask for links to back up any claims you make.
Editat ultima dată de Nakos; 17 mai 2020 la 16:23
< >
Se afișează 61-75 din 76 comentarii
Per pagină: 1530 50

Data postării: 7 mai 2020 la 13:27
Postări: 76