Instalează Steam
conectare
|
limbă
简体中文 (chineză simplificată)
繁體中文 (chineză tradițională)
日本語 (japoneză)
한국어 (coreeană)
ไทย (thailandeză)
български (bulgară)
Čeština (cehă)
Dansk (daneză)
Deutsch (germană)
English (engleză)
Español - España (spaniolă - Spania)
Español - Latinoamérica (spaniolă - America Latină)
Ελληνικά (greacă)
Français (franceză)
Italiano (italiană)
Bahasa Indonesia (indoneziană)
Magyar (maghiară)
Nederlands (neerlandeză)
Norsk (norvegiană)
Polski (poloneză)
Português (portugheză - Portugalia)
Português - Brasil (portugheză - Brazilia)
Русский (rusă)
Suomi (finlandeză)
Svenska (suedeză)
Türkçe (turcă)
Tiếng Việt (vietnameză)
Українська (ucraineană)
Raportează o problemă de traducere
actually Trukr, Borderlands Wikia once mentioned something about the reason why Brick even went to Pandora, was to search for his sister (on top of loot)
See how little sense there is in using opinions for proving something?
Jack sees the warrior as a means to an end of the chaos on Pandora and the vault hunters see the warrior as a means to ending Jack both sides try to abuse its power and Jack wins over the raiders, but loses to the player.
Jack may have tortured people but so have the raiders and both sides do wahtever they need to to win, ethics are thrown out the window so neither side should really a overwhelming moral victory.
Jack is not a conventional villian but a more complex one, as he his the antagonist and as the protaginist we have to fight him, thus he is a villian to us but in reality all sides are bad we just joined the one that is against our enemy.
he is not just a villan, he is a supervillan for those sins
Yoru last statement can be argued in which I think you are correct but there can be folly to it, now Jack is the villian because it was made so, I kinda want a spin-off of this game but as Jacks pov or at least a book or something to go off of. Lets say that Jack did for all intents and purposes lock Angel up soley to abuse her and that he wasn't doing any good of it, soly for vault and self gain. Then I would say Jack is more of a villan in motives however, he still can be a good person as what he does can still have a positive impact on the world around him, we can't turly be sure of his entire plans nor what his goals were after this but it is interesting to speculate and granted we cannot define love as it is a personal emotion.
As for world cleansing, Take Halo, or Starcraft or any game with a swarm of unstopable power, world cleansing is the only chocie that gets results in those cases, and in this game it does seem more plasuable then other forms of re-civilizing Pandora.
That whole hitler thing Im not really sure what it is, so im gonna go off of what you quoted. People's opinions are their lives, we make decisions off of everything we know or how we feel that being said our lives are run by opinions and personal experience but they don't make up our life, our life is biological and thus can be seperable from mental. That being said I think the point was not that opinions are more important than peoples lives but the emphisis opinions have on peoples lives.
edit: love is defined as "an intense feeling of deep affection." It can be defined. For all intents and purposes enslaving someone and pumping them full of foregin substances for personal gain is not affection. Jack clearly did not love Angel much as a serial cheater does not actually love their partner. Words are just words and anyone can play at semantics, but meaning is shown through actions. Jack's actions do not in any way show love for his daughter