Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
Example: Cannonesse besides a hospitaller and sacrescants 8 armour min 17% invul from faith, Rosarius (min50% invul) , 17% witchfire resi from Faith, 17%(16.5) fnp from Hospitaller, 17% (16.5)fnp from Sacrescants
Total dmg negation aggainst an attack with 2ap, that isnt a psychic one =
dmg x 0.5[armour] x 0.5[rosarius] x 0.67 [fnp]
That is not true. Inv doesn't stack only when Min invulnerable is mentioned.
17%+33% inv would be 50% inv
17%min+33% would be 33% as min only takes the lowest if no other is present, hence, minimum.
For coding this is true.
However, I believe it's the Dev's policy that Invulnerable Damage Reduction is always coded as non-stacking. This is in line with 7th edition Table Top rules.
My original points stands (Thanks Dex), non-min inv does stack.
The maximum minimum, as it were. :-p