login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
basically if you're a newer/low seed player even if you get enough points you will get screwed over by the buchholz system most likely if the player count number isn't even
the point of it is that you have the same points
you score doesn't matter 100% because you can take 1 round and still get points
if you get a bye you have 0 chance of getting buchholz points for all you know it could of been 2 wins or 0-2
it doesn't matter what you consider what someone deserves because the point system is not who you think deserves what it's based on the system and the system should be fair for all not cucking low seed players to the tourney org's fault of not gathering even number of players
if it was up to who you think deserves to be what place then you wouldn't see a lot of subjectively mediocre players in top 8
it also doesn't matter if you count a specific scenario because it turns any chance to almost 0% including future scenarios
If anything the system is unfair in advantage of new players as the bye currently counts as one guaranteed win.
"it also doesn't matter if you count a specific scenario because it turns any chance to almost 0% including future scenarios"
the bye could of been a 2-0 or a 0-2 and will be unknown
your end score doesn't matter 100% because 1 round not winning match still gives some points and that would of been enough but same score + negative buchholz points = cucked by tourney system and will probably apply to future scenarios
comebacks are possible and if they do happen then buchholz points will ensure a loss almost always
not talking about any specific scenario am mentioning it for future scenarios
byes also means 1 less game and having to wait an entire round in probably boredom
And byes, much like the problems with matchmaking, are resolved with higher population counts.
You get points for rounds and the bye was not given to the same player in last KPC. It does not matter if you think someone is no match for top 8. All it matters is someone is able to get same points as top 8 but get cucked by 0 buchholz points for byes including future scenarios.
As long as you are not the bottom seed, everything is fine. And I tell you what, I should up the sign up process a tiny bit to tell new sign ups to include their current/highest 1v1 ladder rank. Then the fault lies with whomever is lowest rank and last to sign up.
The 2nd part sounds like a decent solution. And is the wildcards ban still necessary? The current meta for next tourney with wildcards and locked decks is prob defenso/divine/wall + cleaver + beam/black hole. Seems boring to see the same decks be the meta due to locked decks or else you're either inting or playing for fun.
This has no effect on the current schedule for tournaments, however, it does mean that there will be 1 fewer tournaments this circuit.
if there were participants instead of a delayed or technically cancelled tournament
rip to the people who wanted to watch