Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
because LESS HATING MORE LOVING
also the khergits are a pushover so you can take them out with ease
This is the flaw of politics, EVERYONE is a potential backstabber. Even companion turn lords can betray you.
But yes, martial lords take personal attention, understanding of how they decide who is in line for a fief, good relations so that they can be persuaded, etc.
With high honor, upstanding, benevolent and good-natured lords are trivial to manage. Too bad they are not trivial to flip.
Oh, yeah. Your gender is definitely a factor(game prides itself on doing fairly well of depicting medieval sexism) I think females get an under the hood relations penalty when trying to flip or persuade lords.
Of course, if like in most other things, gender is counter by renown, my characters always have insane renown, due to my small party sizes, so I may have just missed it.
As for my wife, she never played a male, so she would not have noticed a difference anyway.
So you may be right.
This was written VERY LATE at night.
So yeah there is a penalty with female characters.
However, my experience with playing female may not be as extensive as most(I have to actually focus on picking female,since I instinctively pick male).
The "under the hood" thing could be a "feels like" scenario, hence the I THINK.
Just saying, take my comment with a grain of salt.