Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
because LESS HATING MORE LOVING
also the khergits are a pushover so you can take them out with ease
This is the flaw of politics, EVERYONE is a potential backstabber. Even companion turn lords can betray you.
But yes, martial lords take personal attention, understanding of how they decide who is in line for a fief, good relations so that they can be persuaded, etc.
With high honor, upstanding, benevolent and good-natured lords are trivial to manage. Too bad they are not trivial to flip.
Oh, yeah. Your gender is definitely a factor(game prides itself on doing fairly well of depicting medieval sexism) I think females get an under the hood relations penalty when trying to flip or persuade lords.
Of course, if like in most other things, gender is counter by renown, my characters always have insane renown, due to my small party sizes, so I may have just missed it.
As for my wife, she never played a male, so she would not have noticed a difference anyway.
So you may be right.
This was written VERY LATE at night.
So yeah there is a penalty with female characters.
However, my experience with playing female may not be as extensive as most(I have to actually focus on picking female,since I instinctively pick male).
The "under the hood" thing could be a "feels like" scenario, hence the I THINK.
Just saying, take my comment with a grain of salt.