Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
If u want to choose - no way, DOS2 is the best rpg game for the last couple of years.
Pillars is more like DnD 4th edition; without any multiplayer choices. I honestly wish I could play it cooperatively. Biggest selling point for me is the *choice* of multiplayer if desired.
Imo, DOS is a lot more classical in it's spirit than POE. I haven't played POE2, but in the first game you don't even get experience for combat. And in general it felt like the devs were so concerned with "fixing" what they thought was wrong with Baldur's Gate that they forgot what made those games great in the first place.
In addition, PoE2 has an option to scale down opponents if they're overleveled, so a lot of your encounters can be beatable. The downside with that is it could get less challenging, but your freedom of exploration expands as an upside.