Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Having different factions within the same side/team is a waste of time.... maybe later when the dev team have spare time would be a better developement model.
There are also way less Marines that there are Army Soldiers.
They might do it in a way that the Marines will be more guerilla warfare focused and the Army a bit more open scale with more air support.
i didnt say they can't have it, no offense but did you even read my post?
Those saying there's no difference IRL are mistaken.
(Brother is a Marine and I am Army)
What the hell? Marines are not a special force branch of the army nor they are more "hardcore" than the army... They just do smaller and short amphibious operations and are just the navy infantry(a marine operation will last a few months while the army gets to stay there for years and actually try to win the war and not just a battle)... The army has done everything the marines do but with longer campaings and bigger operations. Igues in the game marines will have the older weapons like the m-14 while the army will have the m-16...