Rising Storm 2: Vietnam

Rising Storm 2: Vietnam

View Stats:
Bandi Aug 16, 2019 @ 2:59pm
What graphics settings are you using?
My specs:
GPU: GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-6600K CPU @ 3.50GHz
Memory: 16gb ram (2x8) 3200mhz
Current resolution: 1920 x 1080, 75Hz
Operating system: Microsoft Windows 10

I want the game to look as good as possible while still having a good fps, 100+ atleast. right now i have everything set to low except for texture quality which is ultra and I get around 150fps average. I have been experimenting a bit with different settings but some of them seems to really mess up my fps. anyone with similar specs who would like to share their own? Or could u give an example of a setting that maybe would have zero impact on the fps because of my gpu or smth.? thanks
< >
Showing 1-15 of 24 comments
pavey Aug 16, 2019 @ 5:44pm 
I have a 1060 6gb, i5 6400 and 16gb DDR4. Everything on max I get about 80-90 fps on good maps. Some maps it can drop to 60 at times.

I noticed your refresh rate is 75hz but you are trading graphics quality to gain more fps. Anything above 75fps is not going show any difference, it's nice to have a little higher than your refresh rate incase of drops though. I think you could up the video quality in some areas to make your game look a lot better and still have the same performance visually
Mr Said Aug 16, 2019 @ 6:51pm 
My specs:
Dell XPS 8900 Windows 10 Por
GPU: GeForce GTX 1070 8 GB V Ram
CPU: Intel i7 6700k Quard core, @ 3.2BHz to 4.2 GHz Turo Bost .
Memory 16 GB, SSHD 512
Res: 1620 x 1080
I have everything set to High
Halogen Aug 17, 2019 @ 12:30am 
My specs:
GPU: RX 570 8GB
CPU Ryzen 2600 3.7GHz
Memory: 16gb ddr4
Res 1920x1080
All on high with 75hz refresh rate
Easy 75 frames on most (not early access maps)
Last edited by Halogen; Aug 17, 2019 @ 12:31am
IYAB_RAMBO Aug 17, 2019 @ 4:15am 
i5 3470K 3.2 Ghz

GTX 1050 ti 8gb ram

Windows 7 + vibranceGUI www.vibranceGUI.com for stronger colors games.

Resolution 16:9 3840x2160 medium world/texture settings. 60 fps stable 60HZ

Resolution 4:3 2760x1980 medium world/texture settings. 60 fps stable 60 HZ

Rising storm 2 vietnam runs realy great on high adjusted resolustions.

Last edited by IYAB_RAMBO; Aug 17, 2019 @ 4:51am
B34CHB01 Aug 17, 2019 @ 12:05pm 
maxed out
headhunter Aug 17, 2019 @ 12:27pm 
i5 4670k @4.2Ghz, 16gb ram, GTX 1080 . Resolution 1440p on 140hz G sync 80-130 fps
Cummies Aug 17, 2019 @ 3:45pm 
i3-8350K Overclocked to 4x 4.8GHz
GTX 1060 6 GB
32 GB Ram (2x 8 GB + 1x 16 GB Module)
1 TB SSD where the game is installed on

Resolution: 2560 x 1080p because 21:9 Monitor.

Everything is maxed out + Vsync. Stable 60 FPS.
Would probably be more FPS if they weren't locked due Vsync, but why if the monitor is only 60 hz. :p
Last edited by Cummies; Aug 17, 2019 @ 3:46pm
I fing hate low graphic people a game centered with trees and bushes shouldn't affect the option ugh
Bandi Aug 18, 2019 @ 3:16am 
Originally posted by 2ndUSSS.H Rct.Crimzon:
I fing hate low graphic people a game centered with trees and bushes shouldn't affect the option ugh

yeah it sucks, i would like to have ground density on ultra but that just makes the game harder :/
Cummies Aug 18, 2019 @ 3:27am 
How much of a benefit does one get when putting vegetation on low? is there a side-by-side comparision?
Bandi Aug 18, 2019 @ 3:29am 
im not sure, but i think theres more vegetation on higher settings
Sogy Aug 18, 2019 @ 3:44am 
setup: ryzen 2600, rx570, 16gb ram
settings: middle
framerate: 80-160 (average ~100fps)

rs2 seems to be not that optimized for multi-core processing. i have alot of fps stuttering. most of the cpu-processing is done on 2 cores and graphics card utilization is usually between 50-90%. on my older rig (gtx1050ti) i had about the same performance with a 50% weaker gpu. some online sources talk about >60fps on ultra with a gtx 1030 ddr5. i also (subjectively) think, ue3 favours nvidia gpus slightly
Last edited by Sogy; Aug 19, 2019 @ 4:54am
Originally posted by Juice in the Oven:
How much of a benefit does one get when putting vegetation on low? is there a side-by-side comparision?
it doesn't remove them fully but in some cases it makes them appear less dense and easy to see through or translucient / opacity and in many other games people turn low on just to see people in cheat ways and it's annoying. Like yesterday I got so pissed off I'm a tryhard I admit but I got shot behind like 3ft of thickets so i came back with low graphics and could see through it.
CLYDE FROG Aug 18, 2019 @ 5:10pm 
- Intel i7-6700k @ 4.2ghz
- 32gb RAM (but only 16gb is usable + using some of the HD space as RAM, or something, forget what its called, and also not sure of the mhz because apprarently my MOBO OC setting set the RAM at a lower frequency. Something I didn't know for a while and I'm too lazy to look into it because I don't have issues with RAM unless the game has a leak or something)
- MSI 1070 GTX 1070
- Windows 7 (fu** win 10)
- 480gb SSD (for OS + select games) + 4tb 7200 + 1tb 7200 + 4tb external HD
- Acer Predator X34 (curved UHD) @ 3440x1440 @ 60hz in game & 120hz at desktop

My CPU and GPU is pretty dated but it runs the game great. I can't believe the 6700k has lasted me this long, what an amazing processor.

I'm not the type that runs out and buys the best video card and processor the day it comes out, I usually wait a little bit and buy the second best. I planned on buying another 1070 to put them in SLI but the whole bitcoin thing made the cost of the 1070 go up so much that I never got a second one.

I'm content at the moment, but I know I'll be due for an upgrade soon, eventually with this monitor.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 24 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Aug 16, 2019 @ 2:59pm
Posts: 24