Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I noticed your refresh rate is 75hz but you are trading graphics quality to gain more fps. Anything above 75fps is not going show any difference, it's nice to have a little higher than your refresh rate incase of drops though. I think you could up the video quality in some areas to make your game look a lot better and still have the same performance visually
Dell XPS 8900 Windows 10 Por
GPU: GeForce GTX 1070 8 GB V Ram
CPU: Intel i7 6700k Quard core, @ 3.2BHz to 4.2 GHz Turo Bost .
Memory 16 GB, SSHD 512
Res: 1620 x 1080
I have everything set to High
GPU: RX 570 8GB
CPU Ryzen 2600 3.7GHz
Memory: 16gb ddr4
Res 1920x1080
All on high with 75hz refresh rate
Easy 75 frames on most (not early access maps)
GTX 1050 ti 8gb ram
Windows 7 + vibranceGUI www.vibranceGUI.com for stronger colors games.
Resolution 16:9 3840x2160 medium world/texture settings. 60 fps stable 60HZ
Resolution 4:3 2760x1980 medium world/texture settings. 60 fps stable 60 HZ
Rising storm 2 vietnam runs realy great on high adjusted resolustions.
GTX 1060 6 GB
32 GB Ram (2x 8 GB + 1x 16 GB Module)
1 TB SSD where the game is installed on
Resolution: 2560 x 1080p because 21:9 Monitor.
Everything is maxed out + Vsync. Stable 60 FPS.
Would probably be more FPS if they weren't locked due Vsync, but why if the monitor is only 60 hz. :p
Though immanently upgrading to this bad boy:
https://m.cclonline.com/product/msi-gl63-9sd-gaming-laptop-15-6-inch-1920-x-1080-intel-core-i7-9750h-16gb-256gb-ssd-1tb-hdd-geforce-gtx-1660-ti-bluetooth-microsoft-windows-10-home-9s7-16p732-478-276257/
yeah it sucks, i would like to have ground density on ultra but that just makes the game harder :/
settings: middle
framerate: 80-160 (average ~100fps)
rs2 seems to be not that optimized for multi-core processing. i have alot of fps stuttering. most of the cpu-processing is done on 2 cores and graphics card utilization is usually between 50-90%. on my older rig (gtx1050ti) i had about the same performance with a 50% weaker gpu. some online sources talk about >60fps on ultra with a gtx 1030 ddr5. i also (subjectively) think, ue3 favours nvidia gpus slightly
- 32gb RAM (but only 16gb is usable + using some of the HD space as RAM, or something, forget what its called, and also not sure of the mhz because apprarently my MOBO OC setting set the RAM at a lower frequency. Something I didn't know for a while and I'm too lazy to look into it because I don't have issues with RAM unless the game has a leak or something)
- MSI 1070 GTX 1070
- Windows 7 (fu** win 10)
- 480gb SSD (for OS + select games) + 4tb 7200 + 1tb 7200 + 4tb external HD
- Acer Predator X34 (curved UHD) @ 3440x1440 @ 60hz in game & 120hz at desktop
My CPU and GPU is pretty dated but it runs the game great. I can't believe the 6700k has lasted me this long, what an amazing processor.
I'm not the type that runs out and buys the best video card and processor the day it comes out, I usually wait a little bit and buy the second best. I planned on buying another 1070 to put them in SLI but the whole bitcoin thing made the cost of the 1070 go up so much that I never got a second one.
I'm content at the moment, but I know I'll be due for an upgrade soon, eventually with this monitor.