Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
There are so many varibles
My 7 year old PC (Q9650, GTX470, 4GB DDR2 dominator, expensive MOBO) ran RO2 and RS full ultra at 60+ (I use v-sync).... so I'd say its you not RO but you.
But RO2 actually ran better on older hardware. Many people found upgrading to new things made performance in RO2 worse.
RO2 really does like the slightly older high speed CPUs that were built entirely focused on clock. Speed. That performance per core rather than multicore performace which is what they are all nowadays. I mean look at the older ivy bridge CPUs clock speeds compared to their newer skylake counterparts. The older ivy bridge CPUs have higher base speeds. Some of the i7s you can get these days can be 2.4ghz. And you're spending $400 on the thing. Which sure as hell ain't gonna run RO2 fine.
a lower core speed. I think it will run better on multi-core CPU's this time around. Though that remains to be seen.
Try to go some spots like the marshes near Solitude without a powerfull machine (vanilla, not special edition, remember it's a 2011 game)
Physics tied to fps.
Yes, very optimized hehe.