Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I've never heard the comments on leaning more, stand up from prone faster, and better fov and don't think these are anywhere close to being true. The main reason I use it is to not have the iron sights block too much of your view such as the case with the M3A1.
Spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1JFJj_63D0Pr3pWdmQNjuavW6DXf2MfCXXgCgSXAQDsk/edit#gid=0
If you're only going to be fighting enemy within spitting distance, folding the stock will make it easier for you to get your gun on target first. Basically turns an assault rifle into an SMG, and a SMG into a machine pistol. When accuracy doesn't matter, the smaller weapon might be able to fire first. What you lose is the majority of your ability to brace and stabilize, since you obviously can't shoulder a stock if it's collapsed.
When I'm going to be working in tunnel systems or inside buildings, I tend to fold up that stock.