Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Thus until we can get this data, as data is fact, and for this type of post, which is a post based on opinion, When we need that fact.
Ruby in the end literally does everything worse then Blake aside from behing able to shoot a Ursa or Boarbatusk which not even all that worth it.
If you are AOEing large guys then you are using the AOE wrong, both Weiss and Yang excel far more then Ruby does at taking out large grimm. Everyone at the very least two shot a Beowolf. The only exceptions are Ruby's third tier close range AOE, Blake's Blade Salvo, and possibly landing that line of rocks from Yang's third tier AOE along with the AOE its self.
So in the end the only thing Ruby literally gets better then everyone else is getting an AOE that can kill Beowolfs at full hp sooner. Everyone has their strengths and you just need to make full use of them to actually feel how good they are.
solely because of crescendo?
you haven't seen yang then
Ruby has a much easier learning curve, but I would say she is far from the most powerful character. Take Ice Queen for example, that is a no special freeze on an enemy which trivializes Ursa's and barbatusks.
We have yet to play Blake and Yang, but I see Yang's recovering SP on low health to be very powerful.
oh you are gonna love yang buddy