Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
You can take a decision to get 300% build speed for them but its not always available dont know what its trigger is
a military factory with all the sensitive machinery in it, yes.
while a supply hub is either a gigantic shed or a parking lot.
this s why i dont bother building one anymore. Just ignore hubs.
Admittedly I dont have the experience that you perhaps have, but I dont see how one can ignore using hubs unless you are fighting a small nation like Netherlands where Germany's hubs would suffice. But in Ethiopia where the terrain is mountainous and the infrastructure is non existent, an extended conflict would be very difficult, I would think. Like China or the Soviet Union.
Railroads & ports should be much more expensive.
In vanilla, hug the coast and build ports.
This:
Our typical Army Group being supplied by said hub is the equivalent of a city the size of Ottowa. Oddly, all the warehouses, stockrooms and rail yards in Ottowa are rather bigger than "gigantic shed or a parking lot"
For a major "supply hub" you're not just talking daily expenditure items either but up to one or two months reserve of everything in case supply delivery falls short, e,g, Dec' '44 the Normandy "hub" had over 600,000 long tons of supply stockpiled
If anything the "hub"s are way under priced in terms of production cost.
(Might be worth any of you thinking a large shed would do the job of supplying even a division with all its needs going and talking to a current or ex serviceman, we can normally do with a good belly laugh)
dont you think you re talking about extreme cases and world superpowers. we "normal" folks all around world has to do with much more makeshift solutions. not every country's single state border as long as entire maginot line.
and none of us surely gonna pull the biggest naval landing in history of warfare. which btw was a product of consortium of most powerful countries of an era.
regardless of all, just tell me which is much more expensive:
-building a single production line
or
-fencing a single area which you can dump your all vehicles,equipment and ammo. (and no we arent talking about high tech fireproof buildings with lotta guard posts and cctv)
----------------------------
then again, disregard all been said and discussed, purely for gameplay purposes:
do you think its fair to ask same construction cost for a hub from a minor with few states and a small army compared to a major? not even going to mention available starting civs. why both countries require same size hub to start with.
In game we have supply hubs which are nothing more than a train to truck transfer point. Trains can dump supply anywhere along the railroad irl. You don't even need a train station for that.
Any civilian building or anything that has a roof few KM away from the front can be a supply hub!!
IT SHOULDN’T even cost 5k to build!
Supply hub cost MORE than military factory and civilian factories, THATS just insane!